Internet Explorer 11 is not supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Tony Evers’ Redistricting Map Helps Democrats, but Not Enough

The Wisconsin People’s Maps Commission proposed three versions of Assembly, Senate and congressional maps as alternatives to the Republican-authored ones. Republicans would likely still maintain a legislative majority.

(TNS) — Wisconsin Democrats would see their political prospects improve but Republicans would still likely maintain their legislative majorities under draft versions of the next decade's political maps created by Gov. Tony Evers' redistricting commission, which he created to provide an alternative to Republican-authored maps.

Evers' People's Maps Commission on Thursday presented three versions each of new Assembly, Senate and congressional maps for lawmakers and judges to consider as the Republican-controlled Legislature fulfills its constitutional duty to present the next decade's political maps for Evers to sign or veto.

GOP lawmakers have enjoyed significant majorities for much of the past decade under the political maps they drew a decade ago with full control of the Legislature under Republican Gov. Scott Walker.

A Wisconsin State Journal analysis of unofficial vote totals in Wisconsin legislative races showed that Democratic candidates received 46 percent of total votes cast in state Assembly races but ended up with only 38 of 99 seats after winning two new districts. In state Senate races, Democratic candidates secured about 47 percent of total votes, but only picked up 38 percent of the seats on the ballot and controlled only 12 of 33 seats.

Last year's voting breakdown wasn't as stark as in 2018, when Democrats swept all statewide elections and Democratic Assembly candidates secured about 53 percent of total votes cast, but they only ended up with 36 percent of the chamber's seats. In 2016, Republicans garnered 52 percent of votes cast, yet won 65 percent of the Assembly seats.

Under the new versions of maps drawn up by Evers' redistricting commission, Republicans would still retain control of the Senate and Assembly, but with smaller margins.

Possible Scenarios



The three versions of Assembly maps would give Republicans a majority of 55, 56, or 58 of 99 members, respectively, if voters cast ballots according to the 2018 governor's race, a razor-thin contest in which Evers, a Democrat, defeated Walker with 50.56 percent of the vote compared with Walker's 49.44 percent.

If voters in Assembly races cast ballots identical to those in a Democratic landslide (a rare occurrence), such as the 2018 U.S. Senate race in which U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D- Madison, defeated GOP challenger Leah Vukmir, 55 percent to 45 percent, Democrats would control 57 percent to 60 percent of Assembly seats.

If compared to a selection of 14 major elections over the past decade, Republicans would still command significant majorities under the proposed maps. According to data provided by the commission, Republicans won 49.6 percent of the vote over the past 14 major elections. The commission's proposed plans, on the other hand, would give Republicans anywhere from 54 percent to 55 percent of the total combined seats of the past major 14 elections. The current Assembly maps have given Republicans 60 percent of those total seats.

The three versions of state Senate maps would give Republicans a majority of 17, 18, or 19 of 33 members, respectively, under a 2018 governor's race scenario.

In a rare Democratic landslide, Democrats would command a Senate majority of 61 percent to 64 percent.

The three versions of the commission's congressional maps would give Republicans either four or five of eight U.S. House seats under a 2018 governor's race scenario.

In a Democratic landslide scenario, Democrats would control four or five seats. Republicans now control five of eight seats.

Wisconsin's most competitive, the 3rd Congressional District, currently represented by U.S. Rep. Ron Kind, D- La Crosse, would remain highly competitive in two of three scenarios similar to the 2018 governor's race, with Democrats taking the district two of three times. Republicans would narrowly win the district in a 2018 governor's race scenario if it were drawn to avoid far southwestern Wisconsin and incorporate parts of central Wisconsin, as well as covering the region directly to the east of the Twin Cities.

The state's highly Democratic 2nd Congressional District, which incorporates Madison, would remain highly Democratic under all three proposed maps, with Democratic margins ranging from 69 percent to 71 percent in a 2018 governor's race scenario.

The Principles



Commission member Anthony Phillips said members drew the maps in a nonpartisan fashion while prioritizing respect for community cohesiveness, and avoiding splitting counties and municipalities as best as possible. Once those criteria were met, the commissioners also attempted to match share of seats in the Assembly, Senate and in Congress to vote share each party received over the course of 14 major elections in the past decade.

"I think these maps have moved the yardstick," Phillips said. "These maps were drawn with a completely nonpartisan philosophy. I think these maps would be healthy for the state of Wisconsin. I think these maps would return some responsiveness to the election, some proportionality. I think these maps would eventually result in politicians that move somewhat more to the middle, and are more responsive to their constituents."

Whole Counties



The maps the commissioners have proposed reduce the number of counties that are split up by district lines. The proposed Assembly maps would split anywhere from 38 to 46 of Wisconsin's 72 counties, compared with 58 under the current maps.

The proposed Senate maps would split anywhere from 27 to 40 counties, compared with the current 46. The proposed congressional maps would split anywhere from six to nine counties, compared with 12 under the current maps.

Evers has claimed the commission is nonpartisan and is meant to provide an alternative set of Assembly, Senate and congressional maps that are free from partisan bias or advantage, compact, and contiguous. The maps are also meant to avoid diluting minority votes; avoid splitting wards and municipalities; retain the core population in each district; maintain traditional communities who share a common identity; and prevent voter disenfranchisement.

The commission excluded lawmakers, lobbyists and party officials from participating.

Republican leaders have hammered the commission, with some calling it unconstitutional. Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R- Rochester, last year vowed the GOP would reject the maps and go about its own redistricting process. Vos and other Republicans did, however, invite the commission to submit its maps by mid-October for consideration by Republicans, who haven't specified when they plan to pass their own maps.

Evers has said his commission is aimed at providing greater transparency around the redistricting process and avoid how the GOP drew its maps 10 years ago.

At that time, the maps were created in a tightly controlled room at the Madison law office of Michael Best & Friedrich, and Democrats were not allowed to take part in the process. Republican lawmakers were required to sign secrecy oaths to view drafts.

Documents unearthed through court cases and a temporary Democratic Senate majority in 2012 showed the Republican mapmakers had tweaked the maps to create a durable Republican legislative majority that could withstand a Democratic wave election.


(c)2021 The Wisconsin State Journal (Madison, Wis.) Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Special Projects
Sponsored Stories
Sponsored
In recent years, local governments have been forced to adapt to a wildly changing world, especially as it pertains to sending bills and collecting payments.
Sponsored
Workplace safety is in the spotlight as government leaders adapt to a prolonged pandemic.
Sponsored
While government employees, students and the general public had to wait in line for hours in the beginning of the pandemic, at-home test kits make it easy to diagnose for the novel coronavirus in less than 30 minutes.
Sponsored
Governments around the nation are working to design the best vaccine policies that keep both their employees and their residents safe. Although the latest data shows a variety of polarizing perspectives, there are clear emerging best practices that leading governments are following to put trust first: creating policies that are flexible and provide a range of options, and being in tune with the needs and sentiments of their employees so that they are able to be dynamic and accommodate the rapidly changing situation.
Sponsored
Service delivery and the individual experience within health and human services (HHS) is often very siloed and fragmented.
Sponsored
In this episode, Marianne Steger explains why health care for Pre-Medicare retirees and active employees just got easier.
Sponsored
Government organizations around the world are experiencing the consequences of plagiarism firsthand. A simple mistake can lead to loss of reputation, loss of trust and even lawsuits. It’s important to avoid plagiarism at all costs, and government organizations are held to a particularly high standard. Fortunately, technological solutions such as iThenticate allow government organizations to avoid instances of text plagiarism in an efficient manner.
Sponsored
Creating meaningful citizen experiences in a post-COVID world requires embracing digital initiatives like secure and ethical data sharing, artificial intelligence and more.
Sponsored
GHD identified four themes critical for municipalities to address to reach net-zero by 2050. Will you be ready?