Releasing Sex Offenders
If you've been following the flurry of state legislation in recent years to punish sex offenders and prevent their future crimes, you'll want to know ...
If you've been following the flurry of state legislation in recent years to punish sex offenders and prevent their future crimes, you'll want to know about an important federal court decision.
A judge in North Carolina has ruled unconstitutional a strategy of holding sex offenders indefinitely in mental hospitals after their prison terms are completed. The decision applies to a 2006 federal law, but clearly the decision could have implications for numerous state laws.
The "civil commitment" idea is nothing new. As long ago as 1991, The New York Times ran a story about a Washington State law headlined, "Strategy on Sex Crimes Is Prison, Then Prison."
But states have stepped up their efforts to keep sex offenders off the streets in recent years, putting the burden on sex offenders to prove that they are no longer dangerous or disturbed in order to get out of post-prison mental hospitals. They'll be watching closely any appeals to this new federal ruling.
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
The Week in Public Finance: A Run on Pensions in Dallas, Connecticut's Warned and a Threat to Muni Bonds2 hours ago
N.J. Court Rejects Civil Service Changes for Public Workers3 hours ago
Gov. Brown Appoints California's First Latino Attorney General3 hours ago
Why Carrier Deal Could Set Troubling Precedent3 hours ago
California Governor Heads to Court to Stop State Worker Strike3 hours ago
Votes Miscounted? Your State May Not Be Able to Find Out3 hours ago