A Loud Speaker's Race
You can make a case that the most interesting election in recent memory in Texas was one with only 150 voters. That would be the January 2007 ...
You can make a case that the most interesting election in recent memory in Texas was one with only 150 voters. That would be the January 2007 vote for speaker of the Texas House of Representatives, when rebellious Republicans nearly cost longtime speaker Tom Craddick his job, until equally rebellious Democrats came to his rescue.
It's that history -- and the expectation that there will be another fight in January 2009 -- that made me notice this judicial ruling, as reported by the Associated Press:
AUSTIN - A federal judge tossed out a state law that bans advocacy groups from spending money to campaign and lobby for selection of the speaker of the Texas House of Representatives.
U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks sided with the American Civil Liberties Union Foundation of Texas, the Free Market Foundation and the Texas Eagle Forum political action committee - an unlikely alliance of groups that came together as plaintiffs in the lawsuit.
How much money is it possible to spend trying to sway the votes of only 150 state legislators? I suspect we're going to find out.
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
Will Florida Gay Couples Really Be Able to Marry on January 6?1 day ago
Somerville, Mass., Will Issue 'Scarlett Letters' for Unshoveled Sidewalks1 day ago
The Week in Public Finance: Traffic Cam Drama, Retiree Healthcare and Another D.C. Shoutout1 day ago
Supreme Court Rules Arizona Must Issue Driver's Licenses to Immigrants2 days ago
The Woman Obama Picked to Improve Police Relationships with the Public2 days ago
Ferguson's Inequality Fight Moves into the Courtroom2 days ago