Internet Explorer 11 is not supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

New Mexico Considers Statewide Universal Basic Income

Las Cruces and Santa Fe are moving forward with targeted guaranteed basic income programs and, if those pilot programs go well, lawmakers could move forward with a similar statewide program.

(TNS) — In an attempt to put low-income workers on more solid financial footing, New Mexico lawmakers in recent years have approved a minimum wage increase and a paid sick leave requirement, among other policies.

The newest debate on the horizon could center on guaranteed basic income, a policy that provides low-income residents with regular financial payments.

At least two New Mexico cities — Las Cruces and Santa Fe — are already considering, or moving forward with, targeted guaranteed basic income pilot projects and state lawmakers heard an update on the plans during a Monday committee hearing at the state Capitol.

Several legislators said they're planning to watch the local-level efforts play out before possibly moving forward with a statewide proposal.

Rep. Antonio "Moe" Maestas, D- Albuquerque, said a guaranteed basic income program could avoid the "cliff effect," or possibility of losing access to benefits due to increased income, that exists with such other safety net programs as Medicaid and unemployment.

He also said many New Mexicans would use the money for basic health care and school supplies for their children.

"I think that $400 is a heckuva lot of money to a heckuva lot of people in this state," Maestas said, referring to the pilot program Santa Fe is launching.

Santa Fe Mayor Alan Webber, who testified at Monday's meeting of the interim Revenue Stabilization and Tax Policy Committee, described the policy as an idea whose time has come after being supported in the 1960s by former President Richard Nixon.

"This is exactly what we need to break the cycle of poverty ... that too many people live in," Webber said.

He described Santa Fe's guaranteed basic income pilot program that will be funded by a national advocacy group as a "stability stipend." It will provide 100 people under age 30 who have children and are attending Santa Fe Community College with monthly payments of at least $400.

Several other cities nationwide are also moving forward with similar programs that follow on the heels of Stockton, California, which provided 125 low-income people with $500 a month for two years.

But some lawmakers expressed skepticism about how a guaranteed basic income program would function and how much it would cost.

Rep. Larry Scott, R- Hobbs, questioned how guaranteed basic income might impact New Mexico's unemployment rate, which was tied for the nation's highest in June, at 7.9 percent, along with Connecticut.

"New Mexico employers are having a very hard time finding people to work now," Scott said.

In addition, New Mexico has long struggled with high poverty rates and more than 926,000 state residents — or about 44 percent of the state's total population — were enrolled in Medicaid as of May.

While state revenue levels have been on the upswing since plummeting at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, providing just 10 percent of those residents with $100 monthly financial payments would cost roughly $111 million annually.

But there could be different types of funding mechanisms available if New Mexico were to pursue such a policy, as Alaska has long offered its full-time residents an annual dividend based on the investment earnings on mineral royalties. The dividend amount for 2020 was $992 per person.

Las Cruces City Councilor Johana Bencomo, who is leading the push for a basic income program in the southern New Mexico city, described the traditional approach to addressing poverty as "patronizing and patriarchal," and said cash payments allow recipients to use the money as they deem fit.

"I do believe that poverty is a policy choice," said Bencomo, who is also executive director of a nonprofit group that advocates for immigrant and worker rights.

She also cited the impact of cash assistance programs funded by federal relief dollars during the pandemic, which included one-time payments of $750 for those who didn't qualify for a federal stimulus check.

(c)2021 the Albuquerque Journal (Albuquerque, N.M.) Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Special Projects
Sponsored Stories
Workplace safety is in the spotlight as government leaders adapt to a prolonged pandemic.
While government employees, students and the general public had to wait in line for hours in the beginning of the pandemic, at-home test kits make it easy to diagnose for the novel coronavirus in less than 30 minutes.
Governments around the nation are working to design the best vaccine policies that keep both their employees and their residents safe. Although the latest data shows a variety of polarizing perspectives, there are clear emerging best practices that leading governments are following to put trust first: creating policies that are flexible and provide a range of options, and being in tune with the needs and sentiments of their employees so that they are able to be dynamic and accommodate the rapidly changing situation.
Service delivery and the individual experience within health and human services (HHS) is often very siloed and fragmented.
In this episode, Marianne Steger explains why health care for Pre-Medicare retirees and active employees just got easier.
Government organizations around the world are experiencing the consequences of plagiarism firsthand. A simple mistake can lead to loss of reputation, loss of trust and even lawsuits. It’s important to avoid plagiarism at all costs, and government organizations are held to a particularly high standard. Fortunately, technological solutions such as iThenticate allow government organizations to avoid instances of text plagiarism in an efficient manner.
Creating meaningful citizen experiences in a post-COVID world requires embracing digital initiatives like secure and ethical data sharing, artificial intelligence and more.
GHD identified four themes critical for municipalities to address to reach net-zero by 2050. Will you be ready?
As more state and local jurisdictions have placed a priority on creating sustainable and resilient communities, many have set strong targets to reduce the energy use and greenhouse gases (GHGs) associated with commercial and residential buildings.