South Carolina Lawmakers Say Voters Will Remember Obama Health Care Ruling

South Carolina's Republican lawmakers expressed deep disappointment with the Supreme Court’s health care ruling, but they said voters will deliver the final verdict in November at the ballot box.
by | July 2, 2012

South Carolina's Republican lawmakers expressed deep disappointment with the Supreme Court’s health care ruling, but they said voters will deliver the final verdict in November at the ballot box.

Rep. Jim Clyburn, the congressional delegation’s only Democrat, hailed the 5-4 high court decision that Congress’ power to levy taxes gives it the authority to require that all Americans obtain health insurance. “I have said throughout this debate that this law is the Civil Rights Act of the 21st century,” Clyburn said. “History will look kindly on this tremendous achievement.” Clyburn, of Columbia, played a major role in gaining House passage of the 2010 Affordable Care Act as House whip, a post he relinquished last year after Republicans regained majority control of the chamber. He remains the No. 3 House Democrat.

Freshman Rep. Mick Mulvaney, an Indian Land Republican, said he was “surprised and saddened” by the court decision, but he said it could end up hurting President Barack Obama. “It’s a major victory for him, but it doesn’t help his election prospects,” Mulvaney said. “In fact, I think it hurts his election prospects. It’s going to be very difficult for him to look somebody in the face and say he never raised taxes.” Mulvaney said he and other GOP lawmakers were especially dismayed by the fact that Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion in the high court ruling and provided the crucial fifth vote.“Certainly the fact that Justice Roberts was the swing vote here stung a lot of Republicans,” Mulvaney said.

Clyburn scoffed at House Majority Leader Eric Cantor’s decision to set a July 11 vote to repeal the health-care law. “It will go nowhere,” Clyburn said. “I just think they ought to stop grandstanding.” Obama recalled a late-night White House meeting he attended before the law’s passage when Obama, over some aides’ objections, insisted on pursuing a sweeping health-care measure over a less ambitious bill.

The House has previously voted to repeal the law, but the Democratic-controlled Senate has defeated such bids. In the current session of Congress, Obama would veto a repeal measure, and it would be almost impossible for Republicans to muster the two-thirds majority needed to overturn a presidential veto. The Republicans’ only realistic chance of repealing the health-care law would be to hold control of the House in the November election, regain control of the Senate and see presumptive GOP presidential nominee Mitt Romney elected president.

Sen. Jim DeMint, a Greenville Republican who vowed three years ago to make the health-care measure Obama’s “Waterloo,” was even more defiant in wake of its affirmation by the Supreme Court. “This government takeover of health care remains as destructive, unsustainable and unconstitutional as it was the day it was passed, unread, by a since-fired congressional majority,” DeMint said. “Now as then, our first step toward real health-care reform and economic renewal remains Obamacare’s full repeal, down to the last letter and punctuation mark,” he said.

Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham issued a dare to Democrats in Congress. “To our Democratic colleagues, stand by your tax increase or stand with us to repeal and replace Obamacare,” Graham said. “The problem for the American people is this is a massive tax increase at a time they can least afford it, and Obamacare will jeopardize the quality and accessibility of health care.” Graham said he’d feared “the broad power to tax could be used by the (Supreme) Court to justify Obamacare.”

Graham, who was an attorney before joining Congress in 1995, was among the few lawmakers or commentators who predicted before Thursday’s ruling that the court might use Congress’ power to tax, instead of the Constitution’s Commerce Clause, to uphold the health-insurance law. "Obama could actually win that argument that the fine (if someone refuses to buy insurance) is really just a tax and we're going to tax you to create a centralized health care system," Graham told CNN in March.

Dick Harpootlian, chairman of the South Carolina Democratic Party, parlayed the high court’s decision into an appeal to activists to help return Obama to the White House. “This is a huge day for the president and the people of this country,” he said. “It is now time to work even harder for the president and get him re-elected in November.” Joe Dugan, head of the Myrtle Beach Tea Party and the group’s statewide coalition, expressed anger at the Supreme Court. “Today, the highest court in the land failed to defend liberty and the Constitution, becoming an accomplice to the President and his allies who have forced this unconstitutional and unwanted law down the throats of freedom-loving Americans,” he said.

Freshman Rep. Tim Scott, a North Charleston Republican, was more measured in his criticism. “Obviously, I strongly disagree with the Supreme Court’s decision,” he said. “The president has said all along the individual mandate was not a tax, but it has been shown today as even more of a wolf in sheep’s clothing.”


More from Politics