Subscribe
Newsletters
Advertise

State News

| More

Supreme Court Appears Divided on Voting Rights Act

Source: Stateline | Nation | February 28, 2013

At issue is whether the act’s Section 5 provision, which requires all or part of 16 states to get any changes to election law pre-approved by either the Justice Department or a federal court, is still necessary and constitutional in today’s world.

View Full Story From Stateline

If you enjoyed this post, subscribe for updates.

view sample

Comments

Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. GOVERNING reserves the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

Comments must be fewer than 2000 characters.

Most Viewed

This Section | Whole Site

Comments

U.S. AG Holder, Gov. Brownback Spar over Kansas' New Gun Law

"RE: your response to me - I understand your confusion. Our tendency to devalue historical..."
Felons' Voting Rights Could Impact 2012 Election

"well that exulated quickly......"
Colorado Becomes 14th State to Offer Undocumented Immigrants In-State Tuition

"Finally, while I do agree with you that people who cheat the system should not be given..."
Motorcycle Deaths Rise as States Rethink Helmet Laws

"How many more lives would be saved if automobile riders would wear helmets. We are talking..."
GOP-Controlled Wisconsin Legislature Targets Milwaukee

"A residency requirement may be limiting the standards and expectations of civil servants...."

Training Opportunities

Health Care Reform After the Decision
In this Mercer Report, you’ll learn how different organizations plan to tackle the new requirements of ACA and discover where most employer concerns are focused, who expects to be hardest hit, and how different health plans and Medicaid may impact overall costs.
Crime Prediction and Prevention