States Seek Court Action on Yucca Nuclear Waste Dump

Federal judges are again being asked to solve a problem that lawmakers can't fix: how to handle tons of nuclear waste lying in temporary storage around the country.
by | May 1, 2012

Federal judges are again being asked to solve a difficult problem that lawmakers can't fix: the decades-old morass of how to handle tons of nuclear waste lying in temporary storage around the country.

A panel of federal appellate judges on Wednesday will hear arguments in a lawsuit filed by South Carolina and Washington state seeking an end to a political stalemate that now could be linked to the presidential election.

The states want the judges to force the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to decide whether the Energy Department has properly withdrawn its application for a nuclear-waste site at Yucca Mountain in Nevada. Until that decision is made, nothing can move forward unless Congress decides to act.

Congress passed a law in 1987 requiring that a central waste repository be dug beneath Yucca Mountain, 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas, but Nevada politicians' fierce opposition has stymied the project.

While 36 states are holding waste from active or decommissioned nuclear power plants, South Carolina and Washington have more waste _ and more toxic waste _ than others. The Savannah River Site in South Carolina and the Hanford Site in Washington contain large amounts of waste from plutonium used in former nuclear-weapons production.

South Carolina Attorney General Alan Wilson said Monday that his state was suing the U.S. Energy Department because it had stopped building the Yucca dump despite failing to get the required approval from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, or NRC, to abandon the project.

"They unilaterally withdrew their license application," Wilson said. "They're not enforcing the law that was passed."

The Energy Department declined to comment on Wilson's claim or on the pending lawsuit before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

The government has spent $10 billion to develop Yucca, but President Barack Obama stopped providing more money for it two years ago, and appropriators in the Democratic-controlled Senate have followed suit.

An additional $21 billion _ collected via surcharges on nuclear power users _ sits unused in a fund that was set up to pay for the Yucca site. In a separate legal challenge, state regulators have asked federal appellate judges for the authority to allow nuclear utilities to stop collecting the fees from users.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Republican from Seneca, S.C., is pushing legislation to refund the money already collected from nuclear power customers, including $1.4 billion paid by South Carolinians.

Republicans accuse Obama of putting politics over an important policy matter in order to help Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, who was barely re-elected in 2010 after a stiff fight against GOP challenger Sharron Angle.

Two years later, the dispute over Yucca remains mired in accusations of politics. Nevada, where opposition to acquiring nuclear waste is widespread, is a key swing state that could help determine whether Obama himself is re-elected in November

(c)2012 the McClatchy Washington Bureau

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.

More from Energy & Environment