Internet Explorer 11 is not supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Lawmaker Proposes to Ban AI and Its Discriminatory Impact

In response to reports detailing AI tech's disproportionate effect on communities of color, Washington state Sen. Bob Hasegawa introduced a bill to ban AI tech and regulate automated decision systems.

artificial intelligence machine learning analytics in street
The Washington state Legislature, which has proposed legislation in the past to tackle issues such as data privacy and the use of facial recognition tech, is now reviewing a bill that would regulate the use of “automated decision systems” and AI technology within state government.

According to the bill, these systems use algorithms to analyze data to help make or support decisions that could result in discrimination against different groups or make decisions that could negatively impact constitutional or legal rights. 

As a result, Senate Bill 5116 aims to regulate these systems to prevent discrimination and ban government agencies from using AI tech to profile individuals in public areas. 

Sen. Bob Hasegawa, one of the bill’s sponsors, said in an email, “I introduced this bill after reading disturbing reports about the disproportionate impact that AI technology has on communities of color.”

“This technology is changing how we live our day to day lives, and it’s important that we make sure it’s not further deepening the inequities and discrimination in our society before we create a reliance on it,” he said. 

Those in support of the bill, such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Washington, claim that if the bill were passed, it would provide strong tools to hold government agencies accountable and make sure that Washington residents aren’t negatively impacted by the technology. 

“This bill would set a precedent and raise awareness of how people’s lives are being affected by algorithmic decision-making tools,” Jennifer Lee, a Technology and Liberty Project manager at the ACLU-WA, said. “There are lots of automated decision systems being used to make decisions regarding sentencing, medical care, banking and other areas that impact peoples lives.”

One area in particular that Lee is concerned about is the use of this technology in regard to policing. History has shown that policing has often been affected by racism, she said. Using these systems to make policing decisions could lead to discrimination against particular groups of people if the tools were allowed to unfairly influence where resources were deployed based on past crimes.

During a hearing of the Senate State Government and Elections Committee, law enforcement officials spoke about the use of this technology from a policing standpoint and asked legislators to clarify how these regulations would impact law enforcement’s use of this technology.

“We have agencies that will use crime reports and algorithms to suggest where we allocate our patrol resources in the highest areas of criminal activity in their jurisdiction,” James McMahan, policy director for Washington’s Association of Sheriffs and Police Chiefs, said during the hearing.

“Many of these, we think we would all agree, are legitimate public uses so we would ask for that continued conversation,” McMahan said.

As for the future of the bill, it is currently being reviewed by the Senate Ways and Means Committee.

Government Technology is a sister site to Governing. Both are divisions of e.Republic.

Government Technology is Governing's sister e.Republic publication, offering in-depth coverage of IT case studies, emerging technologies and the implications of digital technology on the policies and management of public sector organizations.
Special Projects
Sponsored Stories
In recent years, local governments have been forced to adapt to a wildly changing world, especially as it pertains to sending bills and collecting payments.
Workplace safety is in the spotlight as government leaders adapt to a prolonged pandemic.
While government employees, students and the general public had to wait in line for hours in the beginning of the pandemic, at-home test kits make it easy to diagnose for the novel coronavirus in less than 30 minutes.
Governments around the nation are working to design the best vaccine policies that keep both their employees and their residents safe. Although the latest data shows a variety of polarizing perspectives, there are clear emerging best practices that leading governments are following to put trust first: creating policies that are flexible and provide a range of options, and being in tune with the needs and sentiments of their employees so that they are able to be dynamic and accommodate the rapidly changing situation.
Service delivery and the individual experience within health and human services (HHS) is often very siloed and fragmented.
In this episode, Marianne Steger explains why health care for Pre-Medicare retirees and active employees just got easier.
Government organizations around the world are experiencing the consequences of plagiarism firsthand. A simple mistake can lead to loss of reputation, loss of trust and even lawsuits. It’s important to avoid plagiarism at all costs, and government organizations are held to a particularly high standard. Fortunately, technological solutions such as iThenticate allow government organizations to avoid instances of text plagiarism in an efficient manner.
Creating meaningful citizen experiences in a post-COVID world requires embracing digital initiatives like secure and ethical data sharing, artificial intelligence and more.
GHD identified four themes critical for municipalities to address to reach net-zero by 2050. Will you be ready?