Internet Explorer 11 is not supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Transgender Prison Inmates Need Protection. Here’s How.

They suffer from sexual assaults at alarming rates. The much-maligned private prison industry can have an important role to play.

A prison tower as seen through a chain link fence.
Transgender inmates present some of the most vexing security and placement issues for prisons. These inmates — especially transgender women locked up in men’s prisons — are shockingly vulnerable to sexual assault by fellow inmates, and even occasionally by prison staff. Placing transgender men in women’s prisons can also be problematic.

These issues are getting fresh attention because of congressional consideration of the Equality Act, which if passed could require states to house transgender inmates according to their gender identity. The solution to this “clash of rights,” as The Economist termed it, may lie with the much-maligned private prison industry, which has the flexibility to safely house this small, uniquely vulnerable population in a cost-effective manner.

Almost all states, as well as the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), currently make initial classifications for inmate placement based on what they typically refer to as an inmate’s “biological sex,” regardless of gender identification or history of treatment for gender dysphoria. Current BOP policy, for example, states that “designation to a facility of the inmate’s identified gender would be appropriate only in rare cases.” While California has enacted legislation requiring its corrections department to house inmates according to gender identity, most other states generally use biological sex to determine placement.

The culture of prison officials, who generally aren’t “woke,” likely has something to do with this. But the real culprit is cost: States often lack the resources to undertake extensive medical and psychological evaluations and risk assessments needed to determine if a person faces a real risk from being placed in a facility that is contrary to their gender identification. They also remain concerned about inmates posing as transgender who have assaulted female inmates in women’s prisons.

Regardless, trans inmates face significant risks when incarcerated. In 2009, the Justice Department’s National Prison Rape Elimination Commission documented that “gender non-conforming” prisoners faced a heightened risk of sexual violence and other forms of abuse. This is especially true of transgender women placed in men’s prisons, who are often perceived by other inmates as weak or as implicitly having consented to sex because they express a transgender identity. In a 2007 study of sexual assault in California prisons, 59 percent of transgender inmates reported experiencing sexual assault, compared to 4.4 percent of all inmates. More than half of the transgender inmates said they had been coerced into sexual contact against their will.

A recent federal lawsuit filed by an inmate against the Michigan Department of Corrections is typical: The transgender woman alleged that she was deliberately placed in a cell with a convicted rapist who assaulted her the next day and that prison officials were indifferent to her pleas for assistance. In Georgia, another transgender woman claimed she was sexually assaulted repeatedly while incarcerated in a men’s prison. Colorado faced a class-action suit filed by about 170 trans inmates alleging sexual harassment, physical violence and rape.

Facing these legal pressures, many prison officials default to placing trans people in solitary confinement — essentially punishing them for their vulnerability. A 2015 report from a transgender inmates’ rights group found that 85 percent of incarcerated gay, lesbian and transgender respondents had been in solitary at some point during their sentence.

No matter one’s views on transgender issues, sheer human decency compels governments to take steps to protect these people. The solution is obvious: Transgender inmates need their own dedicated housing units that can respond to their unique needs. That’s happened in a few facilities, including a 30-bed unit in New York City’s Rikers Island jail that opened in 2014. But such examples are few and far between, mostly for reasons of expense but also because such specialized units tend to run against the grain of our industrialized prison system, which usually achieves cost controls by operating on a massive (and often dehumanizing) scale.

This is where the private prison industry may have a unique, albeit unexpected, role to play. Establishing a transgender unit within a single state’s corrections system is difficult and expensive; with a relatively small number of transgender inmates, most corrections departments cannot “scale up” to make such specialized units affordable. However, private prison companies can contract on a regional or multistate basis to house transgender people at a reasonable cost to taxpayers.

Those who break the law must be held accountable. But no one is sentenced to being raped in prison. Government has an obligation to protect everyone from assault when behind bars. Since government-run prisons have fumbled the admittedly difficult task of safely housing transgender inmates, maybe it is time to try another option.

Governing's opinion columns reflect the views of their authors and not necessarily those of Governing's editors or management.
David Safavian is general counsel of the American Conservative Union and director of the Nolan Center for Justice. He can be reached at
Special Projects
Sponsored Stories
In recent years, local governments have been forced to adapt to a wildly changing world, especially as it pertains to sending bills and collecting payments.
Workplace safety is in the spotlight as government leaders adapt to a prolonged pandemic.
While government employees, students and the general public had to wait in line for hours in the beginning of the pandemic, at-home test kits make it easy to diagnose for the novel coronavirus in less than 30 minutes.
Governments around the nation are working to design the best vaccine policies that keep both their employees and their residents safe. Although the latest data shows a variety of polarizing perspectives, there are clear emerging best practices that leading governments are following to put trust first: creating policies that are flexible and provide a range of options, and being in tune with the needs and sentiments of their employees so that they are able to be dynamic and accommodate the rapidly changing situation.
Service delivery and the individual experience within health and human services (HHS) is often very siloed and fragmented.
In this episode, Marianne Steger explains why health care for Pre-Medicare retirees and active employees just got easier.
Government organizations around the world are experiencing the consequences of plagiarism firsthand. A simple mistake can lead to loss of reputation, loss of trust and even lawsuits. It’s important to avoid plagiarism at all costs, and government organizations are held to a particularly high standard. Fortunately, technological solutions such as iThenticate allow government organizations to avoid instances of text plagiarism in an efficient manner.
Creating meaningful citizen experiences in a post-COVID world requires embracing digital initiatives like secure and ethical data sharing, artificial intelligence and more.
GHD identified four themes critical for municipalities to address to reach net-zero by 2050. Will you be ready?