More Functionally Obsolete Than Structurally Deficient Bridges in the Country

The four-lane bridge north of Seattle that collapsed and send several cars into the Skagit River Friday was rated by the Federal Highway Administration as "functionally obsolete" and was in far better shape than many bridges around the country.
May 28, 2013

By Melissa Maynard

The four-lane Interstate 5 bridge north of Seattle that collapsed into the Skagit River was rated by the Federal Highway Administration as “functionally obsolete.” That bridge, crossed by more than 67,000 vehicles a day, was in far better shape than many bridges around the country.

A bridge rated “functionally obsolete” does not meet current design standards for such things as lane width, often because current traffic volumes exceed what was expected when the bridge was built. In other cases, design standards have changed since construction. There are 84,748 bridges functionally obsolete bridges in the country, according to Federal Highway Administration data.

Want more infrastructure news? Click here.

But another federal rating of bridges, “structurally deficient,” is worse. They are not necessarily unsafe, but are “characterized by deteriorated conditions of significant bridge elements and potentially reduced load carrying capacity,” according to the FHA. There are 66,749 of them in the country, and they require significant maintenance and repair to stay in service.

The Washington bridge in Mt. Vernon failed after a support was struck by a truck carrying an oversized load. Three travelers sustained minor injuries.

On the whole, Washington state’s bridges are in pretty good shape compared to other states. According to an analysis of federal data by the advocacy group Transportation for America, 5.1 percent of Washington’s bridges are structurally deficient, earning it a ranking of 46th most deficient by percentage.

States with the most structurally deficient bridges:

Pennsylvania, 26.5 percent

Oklahoma, 22 percent

Iowa, 21.7 percent

Rhode Island, 21.6 percent

South Dakota, 20.3 percent

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.

More from Infrastructure & Environment