Internet Explorer 11 is not supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Why Municipal Bonds Have Been Tax Free for a Century

State and local leaders have billions of reasons to worry Congress could end the tax exemption for municipal bond investors.

Gov Summer 2025
David Kidd
Editor's Note: This article appears in Governing's Summer 2025 magazine. You can subscribe here.

With congressional Republicans considering a menu of revenue-raising options to offset tax cuts, one potential item has sent shivers through state and local finance officers: lifting the tax exemption on municipal bond interest. It’s a feature of the tax code that lowers borrowing costs and helps fund infrastructure projects.

Under the exemption, bond buyers don’t have to pay taxes on the interest they collect from bonds. That makes municipal bonds an attractive investment and it lowers the cost of debt for cities and other government entities, pumping billions into local infrastructure. Cities issued a record $513 billion worth of bonds last year, $450 billion of which were tax-exempt.

But why is municipal bond interest tax-exempt in the first place? It was never an intentional policy choice. Congress included the exemption in the Revenue Act of 1913. At the time, they were following a Supreme Court decision finding that the federal government lacked constitutional authority to tax municipal bond interest.

Over the ensuing decades, evolving legal decisions have weakened that precedent. It’s now fairly clear that Congress could lift the exemption if it wanted to, says Thomas Brosy, a researcher at the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center — even if, for now, states and localities have dodged that particular bullet.
Jared Brey is a senior staff writer for Governing. He can be found on Twitter at @jaredbrey.