AI Hiring Tech Being Used Despite Lack of Substantive Support

The algorithm examines facial expressions, word choice and tone to establish “willingness to learn” and “personal stability.” But AI researchers say “regulators should ban the use of affect recognition” due to potential discrimination.

(TNS) — Companies are leaping into emotion-recognition technology, also called “affect recognition,” despite no substantive evidence it actually works.

More than 100 employers already have used it to evaluate more than a million video job interviews, the Washington Post reported in November. The hiring algorithm evaluates an applicant’s facial expressions, voice and word selection to come up with scores in categories such as “willingness to learn” and even “personal stability.”

Affect-recognition technology also reportedly is being used by law enforcement to analyze suspects’ stress and by casinos to identify employees and customers feeling anger, fear or sadness. Prisons are starting to use it to pick up early signs of aggression.

The AI Now Institute at New York University notes that the technology is being touted for uses such as determining “the price of insurance, patient pain assessment [and] student performance in school.”

The problem: the technology at this point appears to be hogwash.

NYU’s AI institute, which researches the social and economic impact of artificial intelligence, insists there’s growing evidence that affect-recognition technology is often wrong and harmful, especially to the poor and people of color. It notes that one recent study, using photos of NBA players, determined that emotion-recognition programs consistently gave negative emotional scores to black players -- “no matter how much they smiled.”

The institute says in its December 2019 report that “regulators should ban the use of affect recognition in important decisions that impact people’s lives and access to opportunities.”

The AI Now Institute was founded in 2017 by Kate Crawford, an NYU professor and principal researcher at Microsoft Research, and Meredith Whittaker, who serves as a lead AI researcher for Google.

The institute’s report pulls no punches about this emerging technology that is already a multibillion-dollar industry. It concludes:

“There remains little to no evidence that these new affect-recognition products have any scientific validity.”

©2019 The Oregonian (Portland, Ore.). Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

Special Projects
Sponsored Stories
Creating meaningful citizen experiences in a post-COVID world requires embracing digital initiatives like secure and ethical data sharing, artificial intelligence and more.
GHD identified four themes critical for municipalities to address to reach net-zero by 2050. Will you be ready?
As more state and local jurisdictions have placed a priority on creating sustainable and resilient communities, many have set strong targets to reduce the energy use and greenhouse gases (GHGs) associated with commercial and residential buildings.
As more people get vaccinated and states begin to roll back some of the restrictions put in place due to the COVID-19 pandemic — schools, agencies and workplaces are working on a plan on how to safely return to normal.
The solutions will be a permanent part of government even after the pandemic is over.
See simple ways agencies can improve the citizen engagement experience and make online work environments safer without busting the budget.
Whether your agency is already a well-oiled DevOps machine, or whether you’re just in the beginning stages of adopting a new software development methodology, one thing is certain: The security of your product is a top-of-mind concern.
The World Economic Forum predicts that by 2022, over half of the workforce will require significant reskilling or upskilling to do their jobs—and this data was published prior to the pandemic.
Part math problem and part unrealized social impact, recycling is at a tipping point. While there are critical system improvements to be made, in the end, success depends on millions of small decisions and actions by people.