Internet Explorer 11 is not supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Christie's Real Motivation for Port Authority Land Purchase

A review of court records, and interviews with current and former Port Authority officials, suggests that there was a more urgent motivation for the transaction: shifting a looming financial problem for Christie onto the authority’s ledgers.

When the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey announced in June 2010 that it had purchased a 131-acre tract of land on the waterfront in the city of Bayonne for $235 million, the deal seemed like an auspicious one for the agency.

 

The authority trumpeted the acquisition in a news release, saying that the land would allow for expansion of the region’s port facilities; New Jersey’s new governor, Chris Christie, promoted it as a spur for job creation.

 

But four years later, the peninsula remains mostly barren, and the authority has taken no steps to change that. A review of court records, and interviews with current and former Port Authority officials, suggests that there was a more urgent motivation for the transaction: shifting a looming financial problem for Mr. Christie onto the authority’s ledgers.

 

The deal, in fact, seems to be the earliest example uncovered so far of the governor and his appointees at the authority using the huge bistate agency as a financial backstop for New Jersey, covering costs that would otherwise be shouldered by the state’s taxpayers and, in the process, enabling Mr. Christie to burnish his image as a tough-minded fiscal conservative to a national Republican audience.

Caroline Cournoyer is GOVERNING's senior web editor.