Internet Explorer 11 is not supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

EPA Approves Oklahoma's First-in-Nation Coal Ash Plan

Oklahoma will become the first state in the nation to oversee coal ash disposal within its borders, the Environmental Protection Agency announced Monday, a decision that pleased utility companies and worried environmentalists.

By Justin Wingerter

Oklahoma will become the first state in the nation to oversee coal ash disposal within its borders, the Environmental Protection Agency announced Monday, a decision that pleased utility companies and worried environmentalists.

"This historic announcement places oversight of coal ash disposal into the hands of those who are best positioned to oversee coal ash management: the officials who have intimate knowledge of the facilities and the environment in their state," said EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt, a former Oklahoma attorney general.

The Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality has regulated coal ash for more than two decades under federal rules. It will now fully take over the permitting process, issue notices, assess penalties and suspend or revoke permits.

Coal ash, more formally known as coal combustion residuals, is a byproduct of burned coal. Under a 2015 law, states can take over enforcement if their regulations are as stringent or more stringent than federal regulations.

Environmentalists fear state control will allow polluters to dump it in ponds and landfills, further polluting nearby groundwater.

"A takeover by Oklahoma means that a bad situation will get a lot worse," said Lisa Evans, a former EPA official and an attorney at Earthjustice, an environmental group. "States are beginning to line up at Scott Pruitt's door to shield their toxic coal ash dumps from public health protections. Oklahoma is likely the first domino to fall in a series of states."

Earthjustice and the Environmental Integrity Project issued a report Monday alleging pollutants are in groundwater at Oklahoma's coal ash dumps. In Noble County, for example, boron and sulfate allegedly were found in groundwater at the Big Fork Ranch coal ash landfill.

"The serious water contamination from coal plants that happened right under the State of Oklahoma's nose is proof that they are not willing to protect their residents from toxic coal ash pollution," said Johnson Grimm-Bridgwater, director of the state chapter of the Sierra Club.

The EPA held a public comment meeting on the coal ash matter in February. DEQ officials urged the EPA to approve Oklahoma's request and environmentalists urged the EPA not to. Earl Hatley, co-founder of the LEAD Agency in northeast Oklahoma, testified then and said Monday that Oklahoma's plan was inadequate.

"These coal plant operators are flouting the state and federal rules, and the politicians are letting them get away with it," Hatley said.

An EPA news release announcing Pruitt's decision contained praise from several utility companies and industry groups. Stuart Solomon, president of Public Service Company of Oklahoma, said he appreciates the approval.

"We agree with EPA that state permitting programs, like Oklahoma's, are the most effective approach for coal ash management, and will ensure that all regulatory requirements will continue to be met," Solomon said in a statement.

The 2015 law that allowed for state permitting was the work of U.S. Sen. Jim Inhofe, R-Tulsa, then the chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.

(c)2018 The Oklahoman

Caroline Cournoyer is GOVERNING's senior web editor.
Special Projects
Sponsored Stories
Workplace safety is in the spotlight as government leaders adapt to a prolonged pandemic.
While government employees, students and the general public had to wait in line for hours in the beginning of the pandemic, at-home test kits make it easy to diagnose for the novel coronavirus in less than 30 minutes.
Governments around the nation are working to design the best vaccine policies that keep both their employees and their residents safe. Although the latest data shows a variety of polarizing perspectives, there are clear emerging best practices that leading governments are following to put trust first: creating policies that are flexible and provide a range of options, and being in tune with the needs and sentiments of their employees so that they are able to be dynamic and accommodate the rapidly changing situation.
Service delivery and the individual experience within health and human services (HHS) is often very siloed and fragmented.
In this episode, Marianne Steger explains why health care for Pre-Medicare retirees and active employees just got easier.
Government organizations around the world are experiencing the consequences of plagiarism firsthand. A simple mistake can lead to loss of reputation, loss of trust and even lawsuits. It’s important to avoid plagiarism at all costs, and government organizations are held to a particularly high standard. Fortunately, technological solutions such as iThenticate allow government organizations to avoid instances of text plagiarism in an efficient manner.
Creating meaningful citizen experiences in a post-COVID world requires embracing digital initiatives like secure and ethical data sharing, artificial intelligence and more.
GHD identified four themes critical for municipalities to address to reach net-zero by 2050. Will you be ready?
As more state and local jurisdictions have placed a priority on creating sustainable and resilient communities, many have set strong targets to reduce the energy use and greenhouse gases (GHGs) associated with commercial and residential buildings.