Internet Explorer 11 is not supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Maine's Medicaid Vote a Test of Obamacare Support

If passed, the state would become the 33rd to expand Medicaid and signal support for Obamacare at a time when President Trump is taking major steps to reverse it.

Maine Legislature
A rally in support of health care in Maine.
(AP/Robert F. Bukaty)
This story is part of our elections coverage. Read our list of the most important races and ballot measures to watch here.

The Maine Legislature has voted to expand Medicaid five times in the last five years. But every time the bill reached GOP Gov. Paul LePage's desk, he vetoed it.

So advocates of expanding Medicaid decided to go straight to voters. They collected enough signatures to put the issue to voters in November.

If passed, the state would become the 33rd to expand Medicaid and signal support for former President Obama's signature health-care law at a time when President Trump is taking major steps to reverse it.

In the last few weeks, Trump weakened the Affordable Care Act's birth control mandate, signed a wide-ranging executive order that, among other things, allows for more unregulated plans, and announced the end of subsidies that help low-income consumers buy insurance.

Under Obama's Affordable Care Act (ACA), the federal government pays 100 percent of the costs of increasing Medicaid eligibility to people who make incomes up to 138 percent of the federal poverty line, which is $32,000 for a family of four. Gradually, the feds' bill drops to 90 percent.

Republicans in Congress have spent this year trying to repeal and replace the ACA, and most of their attempts eliminated funding for Medicaid expansion, which proved to be a dealbreaker for Democrats and many Republicans. In fact, two Maine congressmembers -- Republican Sen. Susan Collins and Independent Sen. Angus King -- were instrumental in defeating those bills. 

“In many ways, the debate about health care starts and ends in Maine,” says David Farmer, spokesperson for Mainers for Health Care, which supports expanding Medicaid.

Opponents of the Maine measure argue that expanding Medicaid there is different than any other state. In 2003, former Gov. John Baldacci expanded Medicaid coverage and subsidized private insurance. Medicaid costs ballooned, and eventually the state fell behind on Medicaid reimbursements for hospitals. When Gov. Paul LePage took office in 2011, he began dismantling the eligibility requirements down to only children, pregnant women and adults with dependents. 

“We already did this, we already tried this experiment. It can’t come back,” says Brent Littlefield, spokesperson for Welfare to Work PAC, a coalition against the ballot measure. 

Supporters of the measure say that with the federal government still picking up most of the tab for Medicaid expansion, there’s no reason not to try. Farmer cites the fact that the legislature has already passed it several times, and that the major health-care associations in the state have endorsed the measure. 

“It’s hard not to feel that momentum,” he says.

The measure has been a big point of contention in the state in recent months. Gov. LePage wanted the word ‘welfare’ to appear somewhere on the ballot but was shot down. The Republican party in the state, however, was able to change the phrase “health insurance” to “health coverage" in an attempt to clarify that Medicaid is government-funded health benefits.

The supporters have outraised the opponents four to one. Supporting committees have almost $800,000 on hand, while opposing committees raised close to $200,000. Littlefield argues, however, that supporters have relied heavily on out-of-state donations. 

There hasn’t been any formal polling on the initiative, and neither spokesperson wanted to speculate where public opinion stands. Farmer, however, says that “residents are more engaged and better informed on the topic than ever before.”

This story is part of our elections coverage. Read our list of the most important races and ballot measures to watch here.

Mattie covers all things health for Governing.

Special Projects
Sponsored Stories
In recent years, local governments have been forced to adapt to a wildly changing world, especially as it pertains to sending bills and collecting payments.
Workplace safety is in the spotlight as government leaders adapt to a prolonged pandemic.
While government employees, students and the general public had to wait in line for hours in the beginning of the pandemic, at-home test kits make it easy to diagnose for the novel coronavirus in less than 30 minutes.
Governments around the nation are working to design the best vaccine policies that keep both their employees and their residents safe. Although the latest data shows a variety of polarizing perspectives, there are clear emerging best practices that leading governments are following to put trust first: creating policies that are flexible and provide a range of options, and being in tune with the needs and sentiments of their employees so that they are able to be dynamic and accommodate the rapidly changing situation.
Service delivery and the individual experience within health and human services (HHS) is often very siloed and fragmented.
In this episode, Marianne Steger explains why health care for Pre-Medicare retirees and active employees just got easier.
Government organizations around the world are experiencing the consequences of plagiarism firsthand. A simple mistake can lead to loss of reputation, loss of trust and even lawsuits. It’s important to avoid plagiarism at all costs, and government organizations are held to a particularly high standard. Fortunately, technological solutions such as iThenticate allow government organizations to avoid instances of text plagiarism in an efficient manner.
Creating meaningful citizen experiences in a post-COVID world requires embracing digital initiatives like secure and ethical data sharing, artificial intelligence and more.
GHD identified four themes critical for municipalities to address to reach net-zero by 2050. Will you be ready?