How Displaced Workers Are Recovering (or Not)
See charts and a few key takeaways on new data measuring how recently laid-off workers are faring across regions and industries.
About 4.3 million workers nationwide lost a long-time job between 2010 to 2013.
Every three years, the Labor Department publishes data on such displaced workers. Reports released Tuesday examined types of workers losing jobs held for three or more years and how well they’ve recovered in the aftermath of the recession.
Employees become displaced for a number of reasons. Roughly equal numbers of workers fall into one of three categories that explain their job loss: Closing/moving of a company, elimination of a position/shift or “insufficient work.”
More Displaced Workers Are Finding Jobs
Long-tenured displaced workers are having better luck at finding new jobs, but the jobs market still remains more difficult than in the years leading up to the recession.
In January, 61 percent of these workers had secured new employment, up from 56 percent in 2012 and 49 percent during the height of the recession in early 2010.
Among demographic groups, just 55 percent of blacks had regained employment. Whites somewhat fared better, while nearly 65 percent of Hispanic found new jobs.
About 21 percent of workers displaced over the three-year period reported they remained unemployed in January. Another 18 percent had dropped out of the labor force. Older Americans stopped looking for work at the highest rates, and many likely retired. But nearly 17 percent of younger displaced workers ages 20 to 24 also dropped out.
Industries Where Most Regain Employment
It’s much easier to rebound from a job loss in some industries.
Nearly 70 percent of displaced leisure and hospitality workers found new jobs. The bulk of these are low-wage positions where the competition for openings isn’t as fierce. The transportation and utilities industry, one of the stronger sectors in recent years, recorded an equal rate of employment.
By comparison, just under 53 percent of displaced hospital workers found new jobs -- among the lowest of any industry.
The following chart shows the January employment status of longtime workers losing their jobs between 2011 and 2013, by major industry:
|Industry||Employed %||Unemployed %||Out of Labor Force %|
|Leisure and hospitality||69.4||17.5||13.2|
|Transportation and utilities||69.4||19.9||10.7|
|Professional and business services||60||19.9||20.1|
|Education and health services||59.9||24.7||15.4|
|Other private sector services||57.7||19.6||22.7|
|Wholesale and retail trade||57.6||22.8||19.7|
For separate occupational groups, about two-thirds of management and professional employees regained employment.
Mid-Atlantic, Pacific Regions Have Lowest Re-employment Rates
Much like the economic recovery, the ease at which displaced workers find work varied significantly across regions.
Those losing jobs in New England, where unemployment is generally lower, mostly found work, with about 74 percent employed in January. Data suggested a far more difficult economic climate in the Mid-Atlantic region, which includes New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania. Less than 53 percent of displaced workers there obtained new jobs.
Job losses resulting from plant closures or moves were most common in the East South Central and Mountain regions. About 46 percent displacements in the West North Central region (Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota) resulted from the elimination of positions or shifts – more than any other area. (See the note below this table for states included in each region.)
The Labor Department does not publish worker displacement data for individual states.
Half of Those Finding Jobs Took Pay Cuts
One of the more frequent criticisms of the current recovery is that many of the newly created jobs pay poorly.
Only 52 percent of displaced workers who found full-time positions reported earnings that matched or exceeded that of their lost jobs. About 27 percent took severe pay cuts of more than 20 percent. (These figures exclude those who found part-time work or became self-employed.)
Still, by this measure, earnings of rehired displaced workers are about on par with other surveys prior to the recession.
In general, those reemployed in stronger sectors found better-paying jobs. Here’s one more table showing the earnings status of displaced workers who were employed full-time in January.
|Industry||Earnings greater or equal to lost job||Less than 20% paycut||More than 20% paycut|
|Education and health services||64%||21%||15%|
|Professional and business services||64%||15%||21%|
|Mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction||63%||6%||31%|
|Leisure and hospitality||56%||10%||34%|
|Other private sector services||54%||41%||5%|
|Wholesale and retail trade||47%||21%||32%|
|Government wage and salary workers||44%||21%||35%|
|Transportation and utilities||34%||18%||48%|
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
LATEST MANAGEMENT & LABOR HEADLINES
Pension Cuts Win Federal Court Support in Chattanooga4 days ago
Amid Financial Turmoil, Florida City Fires Its New Manager4 days ago
Is 2015 the Year of the Electric (Government) Car?4 days ago
California Pension System Paid Billions in Private Equity Bonuses4 days ago
3 Things the New Tax Incentive Disclosures Rule Won't Reveal4 days ago
Why Are Kentucky's Legislative Pensions Such a Mystery?5 days ago