Elizabeth Daigneau is GOVERNING's managing editor.E-mail: email@example.com
In October 1987, the first-ever issue of Governing debuted with a cover story on the new era of “Fend-for-Yourself Federalism.” That feature detailed how, shortly after he took office in 1980, President Ronald Reagan began dismantling most of the federal domestic agenda. Reagan’s efforts to shift power and responsibility from the federal government to the state and local level led to a newfound prominence and strength for states and localities.
Seven years into Reagan’s presidency, states and localities were fending for themselves in unprecedented and imaginative ways. After decades of taking a back seat to Washington, state and local governments were invigorated. They raised taxes -- state tax collections rose by a third between 1983 and 1986 -- and enacted a wave of reforms to such institutions as public schools and welfare departments. Partisanship declined sharply, and several state legislatures gave local jurisdictions more authority, scrapping unpopular rules and regulations that had strained state and local relations. Governing predicted a future in which the federal government would build its programs around the innovations of states and localities. Over the next two decades, that's just what happened.
Now, 24 years later, the same process of "devolution" is taking place again -- but this time it's the states that are attempting to shift power and responsibility to cities and counties. It is too early to know if this effort will result in the same creativity and innovation seen in the 1980s and '90s. But as localities shoulder more and more of the burden of making government work efficiently, cities may take on a greater role as the true laboratories of democracy.
Read the 1987 article, "The New Federalism," at governing.com/federalism
More Management & Labor Data in: