Economic Development
| More

Great Park Takes Shape

Orange County's mega-park clears one hurdle but hits others.

BY: | April 30, 2009



Ask 10 people what a park should be, and you're likely to get 10 different answers. Some think parks are for strolling, hiking, bicycling or rollerblading. Others envision gardens, fountains and manicured lawns. A park can be a place for loud concerts or reflective silence; highbrow art appreciation or mindless sunbathing; organized sports or pick-up games; or, really, just about anything human beings like to do.

The good news for Orange County, California, is that when you've got 1,347 acres to work with, there's room for almost everything. The bad news is, it takes a while to work through all the demands. It's been seven years now since Orange County decided to build its "Great Park" on the site of a former Marine Corps air base. In February, the park's governing board finally approved a comprehensive park design. Last month, the board voted on the first round of construction work, which is to include bulldozing a lot of the flat, runway-crossed land into its new topography, as well as constructing eight soccer fields, a 20-acre lake and a community farm.

The prolonged planning process, with its many design unveilings, has worn some people out. Christina Shea, a member of the Orange County Great Park Corp.'s board of directors, told the Orange County Register, "Sometimes, I feel like I am going to the same wedding several times a year." Now, it looks like there will be more delays. The park's build-out plan relies heavily on tax-increment financing derived from development of the land surrounding the park. The housing slump will push that development back by at least a couple of years and maybe more. At times like this, it's worth remembering that New York's Central Park also took seven years to plan--and another 15 to build. That fact is not lost on park chairman Larry Agran. "I'm glad we took the time and effort to create a world-class design for the whole park," Agran says. "But we should've emphasized that this is a 10-, 15- or 20-year project, and not a 3- to 5-year one."


If you enjoyed this post, subscribe for updates.

Christopher Swope
Christopher Swope

Christopher Swope was GOVERNING's executive editor.

E-mail: mailbox@governing.com
Twitter: @governing

Comments



Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. GOVERNING reserves the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

Comments must be fewer than 2000 characters.

Latest from Economic Development

  • Which States Have Recovered the Most Lost Jobs?
  • Last month marked the four-year anniversary of the end of the recession. While employment has returned to pre-recession levels in a few states, most are still far from recovering lost jobs.

More From Economic Development

GOVERNING Data

Events & Webinars

  • Putting Crooks on Notice: How you can fight Identity Fraud
  • October 24, 2013
  • Fraud is on the rise. There is evidence that fraud has permeated virtually every government-based benefit program at the state, local and federal level. The federal government estimates that three to five percent of public assistance dollars are lost each year to fraud, and tax related identity fraud has grown 650% since 2008.


More Events & Webinars


© 2011 e.Republic, Inc. All Rights reserved.    |   Privacy Policy   |   Site Map