Pennsylvania lawmakers just approved a plan to hike wholesale gas taxes, generating $2.3 billion in additional yearly transportation funding. Governing spoke with Pennsylvania Transportation Secretary Barry Schoch about how the legislation was passed and what the state will do with the money. This interview has been edited and condensed for clarity.

This column appears in our free monthly Infrastructure e-newsletter. Click to subscribe.

Why did Pennsylvania allow the problem to fester for so long?

The last time the state did anything significant on transportation funding was 1997. That's the last time registration fees or license fees or gas tax rates were changed. We've been underinvesting for decades. Meanwhile, we've got an old system in Pennsylvania. We have 25,000 bridges, and their average age is 51 years. I don't know that I want to say it was a crisis, but it got to the point that you realized if you didn't do something now, it's not going away and it's not getting better.

Why did the revenue plan finally gain traction?

The Senate moved on it last spring, but the House was where it was stuck. I'll give credit to House Speaker Sam Smith and Democratic Leader Frank Dermody. I approached both of them. The House had not really engaged in negotiating the bill, and we said we needed that to happen. I think you saw rank-and-file members start to get interested. The governor and I were both aggressive this fall in pointing out the consequences of no action from a public safety standpoint and an economic standpoint.

How'd you make the case for this, since tax hikes aren't popular?

I said there's a cost if you take action and a cost of inaction. I said the [Department of Transportation] is no different than a utility company. We charge for access to a system and for using it. If a water company has to rebuild lines to get service to you, you'll have to pay your share. We're no different. Just like your car and just like your home, you have to maintain roads and eventually replace them.

I talked about the consequences of inaction and said if we don't do anything about this, I'll have to start weight-restricting bridges. I said, "What you're telling me is we're not going to fund it, so start shutting it down."

Even if you're a fiscal conservative, even if you believe we shouldn't put more money into the system, nobody's suggesting to me we should take 5,000 miles of road and get rid of it. I said we collectively own it. Would you quit changing the oil in your car? Would you take your family on a driving vacation if you knew you had old tires? Of course you wouldn't. Yet that's what you're asking me to do.

The chambers of commerce and user groups -- like the agriculture industry, AARP, emergency responders -- they made a lot of noise on this, saying it's important to quality of life. And companies are seeing the condition of this infrastructure as they decide whether to relocate or stay here.

Will you have to ask for more money again?

We have a federal mandate saying we'll have a 40 percent increase in fuel efficiency. I don't think you can say we won't have to deal with it. I think long term, the nation needs to come to terms with the fact that we need to go to mileage-based fee if we're going to be a user-fee system.

Does this boost morale in the department?

It's a much better set of problems to be dealing with. We've all been frustrated with the fact that we haven't been able to do our jobs. Now the team at PennDOT is excited about this opportunity.


Links to planning and infrastructure stories you might have missed

A Virginia man racked up a $200,000 bill after failing to pay to use the Dulles Toll Road, Washington, D.C.-based WTOP reports. Under a settlement, he'll pay $150 a month for decades to clear his debt.

New forecasts from the American Road & Transportation Builders Association project five percent growth in the transportation infrastructure construction market next year. The boost is led by a 17 percent projected increase in money spend on airport runway and terminal construction.

The Huffington Post highlights 18 renderings of infrastructure, real estate, and park projects that may be on the horizon in Detroit.

Democratic Rep. Earl Blumenauer of Oregon made news by proposing a 15-cent gas tax hike, but the Eno Center for Transportation says further reliance on the gas tax could have some negative effects, like further entrenching divisions between modes and "donor-donee" battles.

High-speed rail in California suffered its second setback in just a few weeks after federal regulators rejected a request for parts of the line to be exempt from review processes, the Los Angeles Times reports.

Last year, Amtrak outlined a vision for trains traveling 220 mph between New York and Washington in the coming decades. But newly release draft specifications call for 160 mph trains, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer.

Massachusetts may follow Oregon's lead and become the latest state to explore a vehicle miles traveled fee under a plan backed by liberal lawmakers, the Boston Herald reports.