Internet Explorer 11 is not supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Parris N. Glendening

Governor

Parris N. Glendening


If making mistakes disqualified a governor from recognition for outstanding service, then Parris Glendening would be out of luck. Nobody — not even Glendening himself — would dispute that his first term featured its share of disasters, including rocky relations with the legislature, perceived indecision on critical issues of gambling and transportation, and an embarrassing flap over pensions for himself and former aides. As he completed his second year in office, in 1996, polls showed no governor in the country with a lower public-approval rating.

But then the governor made a dramatic turnaround. In the closing months of his first term, he reached accommodation with lawmakers, set out a comprehensive policy agenda, and projected a new aura of decisiveness that led him to a comfortable second-term victory in 1998. Then, reelection in hand, he embarked on one of the most productive periods of legislative achievement recorded by any Maryland governor.

The centerpiece of Glendening’s administration, and the product for which he will be remembered longest, is the Smart Growth law that he conceived, wrote and steered through to passage. When Glendening first took office, urban sprawl was an issue hidden somewhere beneath the radar of most legislators, and “smart growth” was a phrase very few had heard. Six years later, sprawl is a high-profile issue in more than 30 states, and nearly a dozen have passed sprawl-control measures more or less similar to the one that took effect in Maryland in 1998.

The Smart Growth Act is actually a rather straightforward idea. Its purpose is to steer the state’s infrastructure dollars in such a way as to discourage sprawl and encourage development or redevelopment in settled communities. It does not prevent builders or local governments from creating new projects on virgin land — it merely says that such projects will no longer get any subsidies from the state.

Parris Glendening certainly did not create the national concern over sprawl and land use patterns, and the capacity of his policies to change the landscape of even his own state remains uncertain. But whatever the future of “smart growth,” Maryland’s governor has done something few of his counterparts ever manage to do: seize upon an important public issue, step forward with a tangible solution, and thereby set the agenda for national debate. “The costs of sprawl — smog alerts, time spent in traffic — are becoming too obvious to ignore,” Glendening says, adding that the problem concerns liberals and conservatives alike. “We used to think that we won business-location battles with tax incentives. Now, it’s about quality of life.”

By the time Glendening began his second term, voters around the state were already familiar with his growth agenda. What few of them expected was the flurry of new initiatives that he and the legislature produced. Even the Baltimore Sun, a consistent Glendening critic, described the 2000 session as a “slam-dunk super success” for the governor. The state expanded children’s health care, revised the regulation of nursing homes, and created one of the toughest gun-safety laws in the nation. A few weeks after the legislature adjourned, Glendening became chairman of the National Governors’ Association, promising to make sprawl the central issue of his tenure there.

Glendening’s personal popularity continues to lag behind public support for his programs. But after a career that has spanned more than 20 years in county government and two terms in state office, and after surviving early missteps that might have ruined his tenure, the 58-year-old former college professor finally seems to have convinced both the electorate and himself that important things can be accomplished without the benefit of charisma. And the past few years in Maryland seem to demonstrate that beyond any reasonable doubt.

— Alan Ehrenhalt
Photos by Steve Barrett

Tina Trenkner is the Deputy Editor for GOVERNING.com. She edits the Technology and Health newsletters.
Special Projects
Sponsored Stories
Sponsored
Workplace safety is in the spotlight as government leaders adapt to a prolonged pandemic.
Sponsored
While government employees, students and the general public had to wait in line for hours in the beginning of the pandemic, at-home test kits make it easy to diagnose for the novel coronavirus in less than 30 minutes.
Sponsored
Governments around the nation are working to design the best vaccine policies that keep both their employees and their residents safe. Although the latest data shows a variety of polarizing perspectives, there are clear emerging best practices that leading governments are following to put trust first: creating policies that are flexible and provide a range of options, and being in tune with the needs and sentiments of their employees so that they are able to be dynamic and accommodate the rapidly changing situation.
Sponsored
Service delivery and the individual experience within health and human services (HHS) is often very siloed and fragmented.
Sponsored
In this episode, Marianne Steger explains why health care for Pre-Medicare retirees and active employees just got easier.
Sponsored
Government organizations around the world are experiencing the consequences of plagiarism firsthand. A simple mistake can lead to loss of reputation, loss of trust and even lawsuits. It’s important to avoid plagiarism at all costs, and government organizations are held to a particularly high standard. Fortunately, technological solutions such as iThenticate allow government organizations to avoid instances of text plagiarism in an efficient manner.
Sponsored
Creating meaningful citizen experiences in a post-COVID world requires embracing digital initiatives like secure and ethical data sharing, artificial intelligence and more.
Sponsored
GHD identified four themes critical for municipalities to address to reach net-zero by 2050. Will you be ready?
Sponsored
As more state and local jurisdictions have placed a priority on creating sustainable and resilient communities, many have set strong targets to reduce the energy use and greenhouse gases (GHGs) associated with commercial and residential buildings.