Internet Explorer 11 is not supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Mike Moore

Attorney General

Now that the tobacco industry is bloodied and bowed, having capitulated to a historic $368.5 billion legal settlement with the states, it is easy to forget that just a few years ago Big Tobacco was considered nearly invincible as a courtroom adversary.

Mike Moore
That's why when Mississippi Attorney General Mike Moore became the first to sue cigarette makers with a novel and untested legal strategy, his fellow attorneys general initially were cool to the idea. At home, state legislators warned Moore not to waste taxpayers' money on what they considered to be a suicide mission. Republican Governor Kirk Fordice went so far as to actually file a lawsuit against Moore, a Democrat.

Today, few fault Moore for overreaching. Mississippi is a staggering $3.67 billion richer for his efforts, and the 39 other states that would later join his quixotic campaign stand to receive similar windfalls. And according to the terms of a national settlement, now stalled in Congress, cigarette makers not only would reimburse states for Medicaid expenditures for victims of smoking-related illnesses but also would pay for public health initiatives and smoking-cessation campaigns. In addition, the settlement calls for tough industry regulation and an end to advertisements that glamorize smoking.

When Moore first laid out his giant-killing strategy back in 1994, his chances of winning seemed about as likely as finding a cigarette vending machine in the American Lung Association cafeteria. For decades, the tobacco industry had consistently fended off claims by arguing that smokers alone were responsible for their actions. Juries tended to agree.

Moore came up with an end-run around that defense. The attorney general — and the outside attorneys who worked for the state on a contingency-fee basis — figured that if the issue of personal responsibility could be removed from the equation, then the cigarette manufacturers might be vulnerable. So the state argued that the tobacco industry had been unjustly enriched by the state's assumption of costs for tobacco-related diseases and illnesses. In other words, Mississippi sued to recover Medicaid dollars spent on smoking-related health care costs.

Not everyone agreed with Moore's unproven legal theory. His colleagues in several other states worried that Moore's tactic would set a dangerous precedent for use against other industries. Other critics argued that cigarette smoking is not a drain on the state treasury because excise taxes on tobacco already cover the health care costs incurred by smokers.

No one outside the tobacco industry objected more strenuously than Fordice, who unsuccessfully charged that Moore — a potential gubernatorial candidate in 1999 — had exceeded the scope of his office.

Moore, a former prosecutor who makes no secret of his political ambitions, insists that the issue is far bigger than either Fordice or himself — bigger even than his crusade against the Ku Klux Klan, the other major preoccupation of his years in office. "I've felt this is probably the most important thing I could do as a lawyer, and I know it is the most important public health litigation ever in history," he said, even before the national settlement was reached. "It has the potential to save more lives than anything that's ever been done."

The suit has also altered the way state attorneys general do their jobs. Having served notice on the tobacco industry of the power of collective action, Moore and his counterparts are now poised to expand their purview into other realms beyond traditional consumer protection efforts.

But for now, in Mississippi at least, no one is thinking about Moore's next legal fight: They are trying to decide how to spend the first $170 million installment from the tobacco settlement.

— Charles Mahtesian
Photo by Bill Jackson/Gil Ford


Tina Trenkner is the Deputy Editor for GOVERNING.com. She edits the Technology and Health newsletters.
Special Projects
Sponsored Stories
Sponsored
Workplace safety is in the spotlight as government leaders adapt to a prolonged pandemic.
Sponsored
While government employees, students and the general public had to wait in line for hours in the beginning of the pandemic, at-home test kits make it easy to diagnose for the novel coronavirus in less than 30 minutes.
Sponsored
Governments around the nation are working to design the best vaccine policies that keep both their employees and their residents safe. Although the latest data shows a variety of polarizing perspectives, there are clear emerging best practices that leading governments are following to put trust first: creating policies that are flexible and provide a range of options, and being in tune with the needs and sentiments of their employees so that they are able to be dynamic and accommodate the rapidly changing situation.
Sponsored
Service delivery and the individual experience within health and human services (HHS) is often very siloed and fragmented.
Sponsored
In this episode, Marianne Steger explains why health care for Pre-Medicare retirees and active employees just got easier.
Sponsored
Government organizations around the world are experiencing the consequences of plagiarism firsthand. A simple mistake can lead to loss of reputation, loss of trust and even lawsuits. It’s important to avoid plagiarism at all costs, and government organizations are held to a particularly high standard. Fortunately, technological solutions such as iThenticate allow government organizations to avoid instances of text plagiarism in an efficient manner.
Sponsored
Creating meaningful citizen experiences in a post-COVID world requires embracing digital initiatives like secure and ethical data sharing, artificial intelligence and more.
Sponsored
GHD identified four themes critical for municipalities to address to reach net-zero by 2050. Will you be ready?
Sponsored
As more state and local jurisdictions have placed a priority on creating sustainable and resilient communities, many have set strong targets to reduce the energy use and greenhouse gases (GHGs) associated with commercial and residential buildings.