Internet Explorer 11 is not supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

U.S. Supreme Court Lets State Assault Weapons Bans Stand

As the debate over gun control laws continues to roil the nation and Congress, the Supreme Court on Monday again decided to stay on the sidelines.

By Todd Ruger

As the debate over gun control laws continues to roil the nation and Congress, the Supreme Court on Monday again decided to stay on the sidelines.

The justices announced they won't hear a major challenge to state gun control laws enacted in the wake of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Connecticut in 2012, continuing a five-year trend of avoiding such cases.

A gun-rights group had appealed an October decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit that upheld core provisions of New York and Connecticut bans on certain semi-automatic weapons and restrictions on bullet magazines. The case could have given the Supreme Court a chance to issue a ruling with nationwide sweep on gun control legislation.

The justices met behind closed doors Thursday to discuss whether to take the case. They voted not to take the case at about the time Congress was scheduling votes on four gun-related amendments, following a filibuster on the issue by Sen. Christopher S. Murphy, D-Conn., senator from the state where the Sandy Hook shooting killed 20 children and six adults.

The justices issued the decision a week after the shooting at a gay nightclub in Orlando that authorities say left 49 victims dead and 53 injured _ the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history. The announcement is just one line in an order, and without additional explanation as to the court's reasoning.

The Supreme Court's action in the case wasn't surprising, and is another in a line of decisions dashing the hopes of people on both sides of the gun control debate. The Supreme Court hasn't decided a major case since 2010 over how much lawmakers can limit the Second Amendment's right to own firearms _ leaving states, localities and Congress free to act.

The Supreme Court has never decided a case about a ban on assault weapons or limits to the number of bullets a magazine can hold. The federal assault weapons ban enacted in 1994 drew legal challenges, but its demise was political when Congress declined to renew it after 10 years.

The appeal in the current case focused only on the New York and Connecticut bans on certain semi-automatic weapons. Those firearms are popular with gun owners in America but also have been used in the Orlando shooting and other recent mass shootings.

The 2nd Circuit concluded that "New York and Connecticut have adequately established a substantial relationship between the prohibition of both semi-automatic assault weapons and large-capacity magazines and the important _ indeed compelling _ state interest in controlling crime."

The appeals court ruling said the law was specifically targeted to stop mass shootings such as the Sandy Hook shooting.

In December, the justices declined to hear a high-profile case over an Illinois town's ban of certain types of guns and bullet magazines. That decision was announced just five days after a married couple opened fire on an office party in San Bernardino, Calif., killing 14.

(c)2016 CQ-Roll Call, Inc., All Rights Reserved

Caroline Cournoyer is GOVERNING's senior web editor.
Special Projects
Sponsored Stories
Workplace safety is in the spotlight as government leaders adapt to a prolonged pandemic.
While government employees, students and the general public had to wait in line for hours in the beginning of the pandemic, at-home test kits make it easy to diagnose for the novel coronavirus in less than 30 minutes.
Governments around the nation are working to design the best vaccine policies that keep both their employees and their residents safe. Although the latest data shows a variety of polarizing perspectives, there are clear emerging best practices that leading governments are following to put trust first: creating policies that are flexible and provide a range of options, and being in tune with the needs and sentiments of their employees so that they are able to be dynamic and accommodate the rapidly changing situation.
Service delivery and the individual experience within health and human services (HHS) is often very siloed and fragmented.
In this episode, Marianne Steger explains why health care for Pre-Medicare retirees and active employees just got easier.
Government organizations around the world are experiencing the consequences of plagiarism firsthand. A simple mistake can lead to loss of reputation, loss of trust and even lawsuits. It’s important to avoid plagiarism at all costs, and government organizations are held to a particularly high standard. Fortunately, technological solutions such as iThenticate allow government organizations to avoid instances of text plagiarism in an efficient manner.
Creating meaningful citizen experiences in a post-COVID world requires embracing digital initiatives like secure and ethical data sharing, artificial intelligence and more.
GHD identified four themes critical for municipalities to address to reach net-zero by 2050. Will you be ready?
As more state and local jurisdictions have placed a priority on creating sustainable and resilient communities, many have set strong targets to reduce the energy use and greenhouse gases (GHGs) associated with commercial and residential buildings.