The final cost will depend on the style of implementation that states choose to pursue. The Fordham Institute laid out three approaches:
- "Business as usual,” which includes buying hard-copy textbooks and utilizes in-person professional development to prepare teachers for the new standards. Estimated costs: $12.1 billion.
- “Bare bones,” which relies on digital open-sourced instruction materials and online webinars for teacher development. Estimated costs: $3.1 billion.
- “Balanced implementation,” which combines elements of both of the above. Estimated costs: $5.1 billion.
The report’s authors also note that states could repurpose much of their current spending on various items, including classroom materials and professional development, for Common Core implementation. For instance, current state spending could cover more than half ($3.8 billion) of the $5.1 billion that states would spend with the “balanced implementation” approach, under the Fordham model.
The institute’s analysis is based on estimated costs for instructional materials, student assessments and teacher professional development. Other potential costs, such as remedial classes needed to prepare students to meet Common Core’s demands or aligning teacher preparation programs with Common Core, were not included.
The estimates by the Fordham Institute, a general supporter of Common Core, come in below those in a February study by the Pioneer Institute, a public policy research group that has expressed opposition to the nationalized standards. Pioneer placed the combined costs of Common Core implementation at $15.8 billion. The Fordham report appears to be a direct counterpoint to that figure, as its authors noted some of their objections to the Pioneer Institute’s methodology in their analysis.
For a state-by-state breakdown of expected costs and potential savings through consolidation, according to Fordham, scroll to pages 4 and 5 of the paper, which is included below.
Powered by Tableau