Internet Explorer 11 is not supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Georgia Becomes First State to Cap Income Taxes

The cap makes the state more competitive with its tax-friendlier neighbors, but states that have enacted similar restrictions on taxes encountered financial problems later.

Georgia has become the first state to put a ceiling on its income tax rate as a ballot measure that lawmakers say will put the state on a more level playing field with its tax-friendlier neighbors cruised to an easy victory.

With 85 percent of counties reporting, 75 percent of voters approved the ballot measure, capping Georgia’s income tax rate at 6 percent.

Proponents say the cap cements Georgia’s status as a low-tax state. “It increases our competitiveness by pointing out to businesses making expansion decisions that, while other states could increase their rates tomorrow, our rates are constitutionally capped,” Republican state Senate President Pro Tempore David Shafer, a key supporter of the cap, said earlier this year.

Indeed, the Peach State tends to be at a disadvantage when compared with its immediate neighbors. It shares a border with Florida, which doesn’t tax income at all; Alabama, which has a 5 percent tax rate; and Tennessee, which only applies its 6 percent tax rate to investment income. Its other neighbor, South Carolina, has a 7 percent top income tax rate.

But compared with the rest of the country, Georgia’s income tax rate ranks squarely in the middle of states. And to policy watchers, Georgia has removed one of the most valuable financial tools it has.

“The state legislature will no longer have the income tax as a practical option if voters in the future want more investment in infrastructure or smaller class sizes or if the state faces shortfalls in future recessions,” said Don Boyd, senior fellow at the Rockefeller Institute of Government in Albany, N.Y. “Research has shown that limits on individual taxes have little impact on overall tax levels. If other needs arise, the state or its local governments are likely to raise the sales tax, or property taxes, or other taxes.”

Other states have enacted caps or similar restrictions on taxes only to encounter problems later. In Illinois, the individual income tax and corporate income tax must maintain a certain ratio to each other, making policy changes extremely difficult because neither can be raised or lowered without the other. This summer, ratings agencies warned Illinois of a credit rating downgrade after the state failed to extend an income tax hike in its 2015 budget.

In the late 1970s, California passed Proposition 13, which responded to soaring property values by capping the property tax and requiring a two-thirds approval of any other tax increases. It made it extremely difficult for local governments to eeke more out of their revenue streams. By 2009, the state was so hamstrung in its taxing ability that it faced a $21 billion budget deficit.

Liz Farmer is a former GOVERNING fiscal policy writer.
Special Projects
Sponsored Stories
In recent years, local governments have been forced to adapt to a wildly changing world, especially as it pertains to sending bills and collecting payments.
Workplace safety is in the spotlight as government leaders adapt to a prolonged pandemic.
While government employees, students and the general public had to wait in line for hours in the beginning of the pandemic, at-home test kits make it easy to diagnose for the novel coronavirus in less than 30 minutes.
Governments around the nation are working to design the best vaccine policies that keep both their employees and their residents safe. Although the latest data shows a variety of polarizing perspectives, there are clear emerging best practices that leading governments are following to put trust first: creating policies that are flexible and provide a range of options, and being in tune with the needs and sentiments of their employees so that they are able to be dynamic and accommodate the rapidly changing situation.
Service delivery and the individual experience within health and human services (HHS) is often very siloed and fragmented.
In this episode, Marianne Steger explains why health care for Pre-Medicare retirees and active employees just got easier.
Government organizations around the world are experiencing the consequences of plagiarism firsthand. A simple mistake can lead to loss of reputation, loss of trust and even lawsuits. It’s important to avoid plagiarism at all costs, and government organizations are held to a particularly high standard. Fortunately, technological solutions such as iThenticate allow government organizations to avoid instances of text plagiarism in an efficient manner.
Creating meaningful citizen experiences in a post-COVID world requires embracing digital initiatives like secure and ethical data sharing, artificial intelligence and more.
GHD identified four themes critical for municipalities to address to reach net-zero by 2050. Will you be ready?