Internet Explorer 11 is not supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

How a Cashless Society Would Harm the Poor

Businesses and governments are going cashless. Anti-poverty advocates say the change is problematic for low-income people, but they disagree on how to solve it.

sweetgreen
(Shutterstock)
By the end of the century, it’s likely that huge swaths of the global economy will be cashless. It’s already beginning to happen. The Department of Motor Vehicles in Louisiana ditched cash last year. Boston's transit agency plans to phase out the payment form. The entire country of India is considering such a move. And increasingly, fast-casual food chains across the U.S. are going cashless to remove the risk of robbery and the burden of slow cash transactions.

But there’s one significant portion of the population that’s getting left out of this transition: people who lack access to traditional financial services like bank accounts and credit cards.

Nationally, about 7.7 percent of people are "unbanked," meaning they don’t have a bank account, according to a 2013 survey by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). Another 20 percent are "underbanked," meaning they might have a bank account but regularly use alternative financial services such as check cashing depots and payday lending. The majority of these groups are low-income earners who struggle to meet the minimum balance required to open checking and savings accounts.

Anti-poverty advocates and researchers say the move away from cash excludes an already underserved and disadvantaged population. The recent spike in cashless fast-casual restaurants, for example, limits the healthy food options available for the unbanked.

“For any business that’s considering eliminating cash payments, it’s important they consider what the consequences will be and who will pay those consequences,” says Linnea Lassiter, a policy analyst at the D.C. Fiscal Policy Institute. “Are the marginal benefits to their business worth systematically excluding a segment of the population that’s largely low-income people of color?”

About 54 percent of black households and 46 percent of Latino households are underbanked or unbanked, compared to only 19 percent of white households, says Lassiter.

"I don’t think [these businesses] are intentionally trying to exclude poor people and people of color, but that’s the impact," she says.

The phenomenon isn’t yet widespread, but it does appear to be growing.

Sweetgreen, a salad food chain, went cashless at locations this year in California, Illinois, Maryland, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Washington, D.C. Jetties, which serves salads and sandwiches throughout D.C., went cashless in 2015. Park Café in Baltimore also joined the trend. And many more restaurants across the country are considering it.

Some anti-poverty experts caution that concern about cashless businesses is misplaced. The real issue, they say, is with people’s lack of access to traditional financial services in the first place.

“We’re not for or against cashless transactions. Our biggest concern isn’t cash or not-cash, it’s banked or not-banked,” says David Rothstein of the Cities for Financial Empowerment Fund (CFE Fund), a nonprofit that aims to provide low- and moderate-income people with financial stability. “It’s about being safe and secure in a changing economy and being nimble in the way you manage your money.”

Rothstein points to the importance of city-run Bank On programs, which connect unbanked and underbanked people with safe, low-cost accounts. Some of these programs, which the CFE Fund helps to run, have been greatly successful. In San Francisco, for instance, Bank On has helped roughly 10,000 unbanked residents a year open accounts since it started in 2006.

San Franciso's treasurer, José Cisneros, agrees that the focus for state and local governments should be on getting people access to bank accounts -- not on halting a seemingly inevitable transition away from paper money.

“Whether it’s a cashless restaurant, a rideshare app where you need a smartphone and a debit card, car rentals … this is already the way that businesses have gone,” says Cisneros. “The reality is, in order to be successful, all of us really want to have a bank account.”

Lassiter, for her part, thinks attention can and should be paid to both issues.

“I definitely think it’s important for policymakers to create a more inclusive economy and partner with community-based organizations and Bank On programs,” she says. “But also, I do think there needs to be a focus on restaurants and businesses that are going cashless because whether or not they intend to be exclusionary, they are.”

Some businesses have already realized this and responded accordingly.

An Amsterdam Falafel in Boston briefly went cashless last year but quickly halted the experiment and has no plans to go cashless at any of their locations, says Arianne Bennett, president and CEO of the fast-casual chain.

“We sell a food that brings great flavors and fresh vegetables to folks of all economic levels,” she wrote in an email to Governing. “It would be rude of us to assume that everyone has access to digital forms of payment.”

Natalie previously covered immigrant communities and environmental justice as a bilingual reporter at CityLab and CityLab Latino. She hails from the Los Angeles area and graduated from UCLA with a B.A. in English literature.
Special Projects
Sponsored Stories
Sponsored
In recent years, local governments have been forced to adapt to a wildly changing world, especially as it pertains to sending bills and collecting payments.
Sponsored
Workplace safety is in the spotlight as government leaders adapt to a prolonged pandemic.
Sponsored
While government employees, students and the general public had to wait in line for hours in the beginning of the pandemic, at-home test kits make it easy to diagnose for the novel coronavirus in less than 30 minutes.
Sponsored
Governments around the nation are working to design the best vaccine policies that keep both their employees and their residents safe. Although the latest data shows a variety of polarizing perspectives, there are clear emerging best practices that leading governments are following to put trust first: creating policies that are flexible and provide a range of options, and being in tune with the needs and sentiments of their employees so that they are able to be dynamic and accommodate the rapidly changing situation.
Sponsored
Service delivery and the individual experience within health and human services (HHS) is often very siloed and fragmented.
Sponsored
In this episode, Marianne Steger explains why health care for Pre-Medicare retirees and active employees just got easier.
Sponsored
Government organizations around the world are experiencing the consequences of plagiarism firsthand. A simple mistake can lead to loss of reputation, loss of trust and even lawsuits. It’s important to avoid plagiarism at all costs, and government organizations are held to a particularly high standard. Fortunately, technological solutions such as iThenticate allow government organizations to avoid instances of text plagiarism in an efficient manner.
Sponsored
Creating meaningful citizen experiences in a post-COVID world requires embracing digital initiatives like secure and ethical data sharing, artificial intelligence and more.
Sponsored
GHD identified four themes critical for municipalities to address to reach net-zero by 2050. Will you be ready?