Internet Explorer 11 is not supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Georgia County Releases Details of Braves Stadium Plan

The new facility, which is being built less than 20 years after the current one, will cost Cobb County, Ga., $300 million.

After initially remaining tight-lipped about the details of a plan to build the Atlanta Braves a new stadium, Cobb County, Ga. officials have released the public cost of the project: $300 million.

Earlier this week, the team announced its plans to leave downtown Atlanta and move to the suburbs after less than 20 years in Turner Field. While the Braves released the price tag, $672 million, neither the team nor the county would say how many public dollars would support the project.

A newly released document outlines the terms of the deal, indicating the team will contribute 55 percent of the project's cost,  $372 million, with the county putting up 45 percent, about $300 million.

The local contribution includes a slew of annual payments. Among those are nearly $1 million each year in county hotel and motel taxes; $8.67 million in annual property tax revenue; $5.15 million annually from a new tax within an improvement district and a $2.74 million from a new hotel fee in that district.

The 30-year deal would begin in 2017.

Interestingly, despite paying for nearly half the cost of the facility, the county will only have the right to conduct "a limited number of special events" at the facility. The team will have the exclusive right to use the stadium and decide which third-parties can use it.

The county will get $6.1 million annually from the team for rent, naming rights, parking fees and marquee advertising, but all the other revenues associated with the stadium will go to the team.

According to the Marietta Daily Journal, the Cobb County Board of Commissioners will vote on the terms of the deal at its Nov. 26 meeting.

One commissioner who supports the project said she only learned that the Braves were considering a move to Cobb County a week ago, according to the paper.

Neil deMause, author of the book Field of Schemes -- which offers a skeptical look at stadium subsidies -- writes that the document laid out by the county still leaves plenty of questions unanswered. Among those: Who will pay for massive highway improvements? What happens if projected tax receipts fall short? Do the Braves get property tax breaks on the stadium and the nearby planned developments?

While county leaders have praised the deal as a boon for economic development, independent economists almost universally pan stadium subsidies.

"(P)rofessional sports teams are not engines of economic progress," Philip Porter, an economics professor at University of South Florida, told Governing in an e-mail. He said the presence or lack of a stadium in an area has "no economic impact" on a community.

Dennis Coates, an economics professor at University of Maryland Baltimore County, called the deal "outlandish, extravagant, stupid" upon learning of it earlier this week.

Communications manager for the Texas Medical Center Health Policy Institute
Special Projects
Sponsored Stories
In recent years, local governments have been forced to adapt to a wildly changing world, especially as it pertains to sending bills and collecting payments.
Workplace safety is in the spotlight as government leaders adapt to a prolonged pandemic.
While government employees, students and the general public had to wait in line for hours in the beginning of the pandemic, at-home test kits make it easy to diagnose for the novel coronavirus in less than 30 minutes.
Governments around the nation are working to design the best vaccine policies that keep both their employees and their residents safe. Although the latest data shows a variety of polarizing perspectives, there are clear emerging best practices that leading governments are following to put trust first: creating policies that are flexible and provide a range of options, and being in tune with the needs and sentiments of their employees so that they are able to be dynamic and accommodate the rapidly changing situation.
Service delivery and the individual experience within health and human services (HHS) is often very siloed and fragmented.
In this episode, Marianne Steger explains why health care for Pre-Medicare retirees and active employees just got easier.
Government organizations around the world are experiencing the consequences of plagiarism firsthand. A simple mistake can lead to loss of reputation, loss of trust and even lawsuits. It’s important to avoid plagiarism at all costs, and government organizations are held to a particularly high standard. Fortunately, technological solutions such as iThenticate allow government organizations to avoid instances of text plagiarism in an efficient manner.
Creating meaningful citizen experiences in a post-COVID world requires embracing digital initiatives like secure and ethical data sharing, artificial intelligence and more.
GHD identified four themes critical for municipalities to address to reach net-zero by 2050. Will you be ready?