Internet Explorer 11 is not supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

Family Housing Affordability in U.S. Cities

Affordable, family-sized housing is out of reach in some cities.

November 2015
Many families with children are attracted to cities and all the urban amenities they offer. Whether the typical family can find a home with both adequate space and an affordable price tag, however, depends largely on where they live. In some urban centers, families are faced with few housing options, forcing them to look elsewhere.

To gauge the availability and affordability of family-sized housing, Governing compiled the latest housing data for the 25 largest U.S. cities. Data presented here compares the availability of homes for middle-income families and the cost burden for those who are renting. An accompanying story in the November issue of the magazine examines some of the challenges cities are contending with as they seek to assist families.

City Home Listings Data

Home values were calculated representing the maximum home purchase families could afford by spending no more than the standard limit of 30 percent of income on housing. Housing expenses assumed a 20-percent down payment and considered monthly mortgage payments for a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage, property taxes, utilities and property insurance costs. Two home values were calculated: One for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s definition of the area median family income, and another for 75 percent of median family income. (See numbers used for cost calculations.)

Trulia provided real estate data to Governing compiled from multiple listing services, brokers and agents. Statistics, current as of September, reflect more than 5,500 home listings per city.

Home listings shown below represent shares of cities’ total home listings that are affordable for a household earning the median family income, with maximum home values they can afford shown in parenthesis.


It should be noted that these figures assume families are willing to spend the maximum 30 percent of income on housing. In addition, many of the more affordable properties in cities are located in less desirable neighborhoods where they might not want to live.

Furthermore, a large segment of families -- particularly young couples just starting out -- aren’t quite earning the median income. To approximate lower middle-income families typically not receiving public assistance, a second test measured the availability of homes affordable to households earning 75 percent of the area median family income. The housing market for these families is far bleaker. They can afford less than half of homes with two or more bedrooms in the majority of reviewed cities, and fewer than one in five homes in nine of the 25 cities. In Austin, for example, 40 percent of home listings have two or more bedrooms and are affordable to median income families, while the same is true of only 10 percent of listings for families earning 75 percent of the median income.

Home values that families earning 75 percent of median family income can afford are shown in parenthesis for each city:


Housing Affordability Cost Calculation

The following data were used to calculate home values families could afford in each city.

Area Median Family Income: 2015 HUD definition.
Mortgage Allowance: Assumed a 20-percent down payment and a 30-year fixed-rate mortgage at an annual rate of 4.08 percent, based on the Bankrate.com national average as of September 3, 2015. The allowance is based on 30 percent of a family’s monthly income after homeownership costs are subtracted.
Homeowner Costs (excluding mortgage): Includes metro area owner-occupied unit median costs for electricity, gas, water and property insurance as reported in the Census Bureau’s 2013 American Housing Survey, along with city median real estate taxes from the Census Bureau’s 2013 American Community Survey (Table B25103). National estimates were used for areas without data.

City Area Median Family Income 75% of Area MFI Monthly Mortgage Allowance for Median Income Monthly Mortgage Allowance for 75% of Median Income Monthly Homeowner Costs (Excluding Mortgage)
Austin, Texas $76,809 $57,607 $1,234 $754 $686
Boston, Mass. $98,482 $73,862 $1,881 $1,265 $581
Charlotte, N.C. $67,197 $50,398 $1,247 $827 $433
Chicago, Ill. $75,948 $56,961 $1,341 $866 $558
Columbus, Ohio $70,974 $53,231 $1,298 $855 $476
Dallas, Texas $70,391 $52,793 $1,223 $783 $536
Denver, Colo. $79,929 $59,947 $1,606 $1,107 $392
Detroit, Mich. $67,699 $50,774 $1,284 $861 $408
El Paso, Texas $47,629 $35,722 $688 $390 $503
Fort Worth, Texas $70,453 $52,840 $1,214 $773 $548
Houston, Texas $69,307 $51,980 $1,155 $722 $578
Indianapolis, Ind. $69,740 $52,305 $1,373 $938 $370
Jacksonville, Fla. $63,293 $47,470 $1,157 $761 $426
Los Angeles, Calif. $62,966 $47,225 $976 $583 $598
Memphis, Tenn. $58,003 $43,502 $1,033 $671 $417
Nashville, Tenn. $66,852 $50,139 $1,266 $848 $406
New York, N.Y. $63,694 $47,771 $969 $571 $624
Philadelphia, Pa. $81,122 $60,842 $1,604 $1,097 $424
Phoenix, Ariz. $64,048 $48,036 $1,225 $825 $376
San Antonio, Texas $63,379 $47,534 $1,052 $656 $532
San Diego, Calif. $73,001 $54,751 $1,270 $813 $556
San Francisco, Calif. $101,913 $76,435 $1,746 $1,109 $802
San Jose, Calif. $106,302 $79,727 $1,923 $1,258 $735
Seattle, Wash. $89,548 $67,161 $1,634 $1,074 $605
Washington, D.C. $109,170 $81,878 $2,181 $1,499 $548

City Rental Data

Families opting to rent are also seeing costs climb, particularly in booming cities.

One measure of the rental cost burden is the percentage of income households spend on gross rent, published by the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey. These estimates are a function of not only rent prices, but also wages and the strength of local economies. Consider Detroit, where rent is relatively inexpensive compared to other large cities, but nearly two-thirds of renters pay more than 30 percent of income on housing. On average, more than half (52 percent) of all rental households spend more than 30 percent of income on housing in the top 25 cities.



City Median Gross Rent % of Income Share Spending 30% or More Share Spending 50% or More Households Spending 30% or More Households Spending 50% or More
Austin, Texas 30.1% 50.1% 24.2% 96,000 46,333
Boston, Mass. 31.1% 52.4% 27.1% 81,601 42,161
Charlotte, N.C. 28.3% 46.0% 23.9% 63,975 33,301
Chicago, Ill. 31.8% 53.2% 28.0% 289,817 152,350
Columbus, Ohio 28.8% 47.0% 25.0% 84,226 44,880
Dallas, Texas 29.4% 48.5% 25.5% 131,354 69,166
Denver, Colo. 30.1% 50.2% 24.7% 70,283 34,604
Detroit, Mich. 40.0% 65.3% 40.7% 78,341 48,851
El Paso, Texas 29.7% 49.4% 21.1% 40,507 17,344
Fort Worth, Texas 29.9% 49.7% 24.7% 58,562 29,126
Houston, Texas 29.9% 49.7% 23.4% 230,103 108,546
Indianapolis, Ind. 33.2% 54.9% 29.5% 78,201 42,013
Jacksonville, Fla. 34.1% 59.2% 29.7% 78,881 39,510
Los Angeles, Calif. 36.8% 61.8% 34.5% 500,914 280,022
Memphis, Tenn. 35.6% 59.6% 32.7% 72,046 39,548
Nashville, Tenn. 31.5% 52.7% 25.3% 62,387 29,974
New York, N.Y. 32.7% 55.1% 30.2% 1,131,868 619,628
Philadelphia, Pa. 34.5% 57.5% 32.4% 146,313 82,570
Phoenix, Ariz. 30.5% 51.0% 24.6% 123,407 59,652
San Antonio, Texas 31.0% 51.9% 26.0% 111,025 55,638
San Diego, Calif. 32.5% 54.7% 27.4% 137,490 68,794
San Francisco, Calif. 27.1% 42.5% 20.6% 89,620 43,462
San Jose, Calif. 31.9% 53.8% 25.3% 69,094 32,430
Seattle, Wash. 28.4% 46.0% 21.1% 72,354 33,182
Washington, D.C. 29.5% 48.6% 26.0% 75,054 40,052

Figures are shown for gross rent costs, which include monthly utility and fuel costs paid by the renter.
SOURCE: Governing calculations of 2014 U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey data (Table B25070)
Regardless of cost, families with children wanting to rent in cities often can’t find units large enough to accommodate them. Many newer developments are without larger units, instead having predominately one-bedroom units and studios along with a limited number of two-bedroom units.

To assess the availability of larger rental units, real estate analysis firm Axiometrics provided Governing with data based on its survey of property owners.

City 2-Bedroom Share of Rental Stock 3-or-More Bedroom Share of Rental Stock Population Density (People / Sq. Mile Land Area)
Austin, Texas 36.8% 4.2% 3,064
Boston, Mass. 32.0% 3.5% 13,589
Charlotte, N.C. 45.8% 9.6% 2,721
Chicago, Ill. 22.8% 3.5% 11,960
Columbus, Ohio 54.2% 6.6% 3,851
Dallas, Texas 33.3% 3.2% 3,762
Denver, Colo. 39.4% 3.5% 4,339
Detroit, Mich. 41.0% 0.4% 4,903
El Paso, Texas 46.1% 8.5% 2,660
Fort Worth, Texas 39.4% 5.2% 2,391
Houston, Texas 37.2% 4.6% 3,737
Indianapolis, Ind. 47.0% 10.2% 2,355
Jacksonville, Fla. 46.7% 11.2% 1,142
Los Angeles, Calif. 34.7% 1.7% 8,383
Memphis, Tenn. 52.0% 8.7% 2,085
Nashville, Tenn. 43.3% 7.4% 1,355
New York, N.Y. 23.0% 6.2% 28,056
Philadelphia, Pa. 36.9% 3.8% 11,635
Phoenix, Ariz. 45.0% 5.9% 2,975
San Antonio, Texas 39.6% 6.2% 3,117
San Diego, Calif. 52.1% 7.2% 4,247
San Francisco, Calif. 28.4% 1.3% 18,187
San Jose, Calif. 45.9% 4.9% 5,754
Seattle, Wash. 24.7% 1.3% 7,962
Washington, D.C. 24.1% 1.9% 10,793

SOURCE: Data provided by Axiometrics, current as of September 2015. Most property owners surveyed manage larger units; figures do not include affordable housing, rent-controlled units or properties undergoing renovation. Population density data obtained from Census Bureau.
 

Special Projects
Sponsored Stories
The 2021 Ideas Challenge recognizes innovative public policy that positively impacts local communities and the NewDEAL leaders who championed them.
Sponsored
Drug coverage affordability really does exist in the individual Medicare marketplace!
Sponsored
Understand the differences between group Medicare and individual Medicare plans and which plans are best for retirees.
Sponsored
For a while, concerns about credit card fees and legacy processing infrastructure might have slowed government’s embrace of digital payment options.
Sponsored
How expanded financial assistance, a streamlined application process and creative legislation can help Black and brown-owned businesses revive communities hit hardest by the pandemic.
Sponsored
In recent years, local governments have been forced to adapt to a wildly changing world, especially as it pertains to sending bills and collecting payments.
Sponsored
Workplace safety is in the spotlight as government leaders adapt to a prolonged pandemic.
Sponsored
While government employees, students and the general public had to wait in line for hours in the beginning of the pandemic, at-home test kits make it easy to diagnose for the novel coronavirus in less than 30 minutes.
Sponsored
Governments around the nation are working to design the best vaccine policies that keep both their employees and their residents safe. Although the latest data shows a variety of polarizing perspectives, there are clear emerging best practices that leading governments are following to put trust first: creating policies that are flexible and provide a range of options, and being in tune with the needs and sentiments of their employees so that they are able to be dynamic and accommodate the rapidly changing situation.