Internet Explorer 11 is not supported

For optimal browsing, we recommend Chrome, Firefox or Safari browsers.

How Big Is the Minimum-Wage Workforce in Your State?

Differences in wage laws and costs of living explain why they're more common in some places than others.

The last time the federal minimum wage increased, Barack Obama was only a few months into his first term as president and the country was mired in the depths of the Great Recession. Nearly nine years later, a small segment of the workforce is still earning $7.25 an hour or less.

The latest Labor Department estimates indicate that just over 1.8 million hourly workers were paid at or below the federal minimum last year. While that's a small part of the overall workforce -- a mere 2.3 percent of hourly workers -- it makes up a larger portion in some states.

More than 50,000 workers, for instance, earned the federal minimum wage or less in Kentucky, accounting for an average of 4.6 percent of all hourly employees over the past two years -- more than any other state. The most recent estimates also suggest such low-wage earners made up more than 4 percent of hourly employees in Mississippi and Tennessee.

These workers have seen their purchasing power decline significantly as inflation has risen 16 percent since the last federal increase.

Meanwhile, in four states -- all with higher state minimum wages -- less than 1 percent of hourly workers earned at or below the federal minimum last year. California’s estimated share was the nation’s lowest, followed by Montana and Washington. (Full-time students, tipped employees and a few other types of workers are exempt from the federal minimum wage, so all states report at least some workers earning less than $7.25 an hour.)


SOURCE: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. See note for more information.
A total of 29 states set the minimum wage above the federal rate. This year, 18 states raised their minimum wage higher either through new laws or existing formulas tied to inflation, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.

Washington state’s minimum wage of $11.50 is currently the nation’s highest, followed by the District of Columbia, California and Massachusetts. Lawmakers in other states, including Connecticut and Vermont, are currently debating proposals to implement additional wage hikes. 

A small but growing number of cities have implemented local minimum-wage ordinances in an attempt to offset higher costs of living, although localities are prohibited from doing so in states with laws blocking local control. Activists in Alabama and Colorado are calling for preemption laws in those states to be repealed.

Along with differences in state wage laws and costs of living, the major industries supporting jobs in each state further explain why low-wage workers are more common in some states than others. According to the 2017 federal estimates, service industry occupations account for about two-thirds of all workers earning the minimum wage or less. These are mostly tipped employees at restaurants.

In many places, tipped workers haven’t benefitted from state minimum-wage laws as much as non-tipped workers have. Nebraska and New Jersey, for example, enacted laws raising the general minimum wage while keeping the federal minimum of $2.13 in place for tipped workers.

Over the long term, the size of the minimum-wage workforce has contracted in every state. Some states, though, experienced a much more noticeable decline than others.

When two-year estimated annual averages for 2016-2017 are compared with those for 2010-2011, West Virginia, Georgia and Texas recorded the largest percentage point decreases in the share of hourly employees earning at or below the minimum wage.

All three states had relatively high levels of minimum-wage workers to begin with. But two other states similarly reporting high numbers of workers earning the federal minimum back in 2010 -- Idaho and Kentucky -- haven’t experienced nearly the same decline.


State Minimum-Wage Workers: Historical Estimates


About the data

Figures represent estimated shares of the hourly workforce earning at or below the federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour. Data exclude salaried workers and self-employed individuals. Margins of error can be high for smaller states, so two-year averages are shown in the map.

Special Projects
Sponsored Stories
Workplace safety is in the spotlight as government leaders adapt to a prolonged pandemic.
While government employees, students and the general public had to wait in line for hours in the beginning of the pandemic, at-home test kits make it easy to diagnose for the novel coronavirus in less than 30 minutes.
Governments around the nation are working to design the best vaccine policies that keep both their employees and their residents safe. Although the latest data shows a variety of polarizing perspectives, there are clear emerging best practices that leading governments are following to put trust first: creating policies that are flexible and provide a range of options, and being in tune with the needs and sentiments of their employees so that they are able to be dynamic and accommodate the rapidly changing situation.
Service delivery and the individual experience within health and human services (HHS) is often very siloed and fragmented.
In this episode, Marianne Steger explains why health care for Pre-Medicare retirees and active employees just got easier.
Government organizations around the world are experiencing the consequences of plagiarism firsthand. A simple mistake can lead to loss of reputation, loss of trust and even lawsuits. It’s important to avoid plagiarism at all costs, and government organizations are held to a particularly high standard. Fortunately, technological solutions such as iThenticate allow government organizations to avoid instances of text plagiarism in an efficient manner.
Creating meaningful citizen experiences in a post-COVID world requires embracing digital initiatives like secure and ethical data sharing, artificial intelligence and more.
GHD identified four themes critical for municipalities to address to reach net-zero by 2050. Will you be ready?
As more state and local jurisdictions have placed a priority on creating sustainable and resilient communities, many have set strong targets to reduce the energy use and greenhouse gases (GHGs) associated with commercial and residential buildings.