Energy & Environment
| More

Extreme Makeover: Clean Energy Peps Up its Image



Electricity deregulation means that customers can choose clean-energy options to power their homes. But the question on the collective minds of five Northeastern states was why so few buyers picked solar, wind or hydro-electric alternatives--power sources that are better for the environment than fossil fuels.

The answer is now clear, thanks to market research done on behalf of the five states: Consumers think of renewable energy as a failed idea from the 1970s and don't realize that renewables today account for 6 percent of U.S. energy production. "Most consumers know that clean energy is better for the environment--they just don't think it works," says Brian F. Keane, the head of a Hartford-based nonprofit called SmartPower, which conducted the study for Connecticut, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Pennsylvania and New Jersey.

To change that perception, the five states hired an advertising agency to develop a new message to show that clean energy is for real and is working right now. One radio spot, for example, notes that renewable sources already produce enough power to run every home computer in America.

Rhode Island ran the ads last spring and summer, and in the campaign's first 100 days, some 1,100 customers switched to one of four power suppliers offering renewable generation. That's a lot by industry standards. Rhode Island will run the ads again this year, and Connecticut plans to run them in March.

Market research also found that consumers, not to mention policy makers, are confused by all the words used to describe renewable energy. The Northeast states settled on the term "clean energy," which polled best with focus groups.


If you enjoyed this post, subscribe for updates.

Christopher Swope

Christopher Swope was GOVERNING's executive editor.

E-mail: mailbox@governing.com
Twitter: @governing

Comments



Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. GOVERNING reserves the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

Comments must be fewer than 2000 characters.

Latest from Energy & Environment

  • Tracking the Carbon Footprints of Cities
  • Scientists have found that urban hubs with over 10 million people are increasingly responsible for human-caused global warming, prompting closer study of cities across the country and around the globe.
  • Oregon Coal Export Terminal Plans Put on Hold
  • The battle over plans for a series of massive coal export terminals across the Pacific Northwest took a new turn Wednesday when the energy company Kinder Morgan announced it was dropping its plan to build a $200-million facility on the Columbia River in northern Oregon.


Events & Webinars





© 2011 e.Republic, Inc. All Rights reserved.    |   Privacy Policy   |   Site Map