| Sponsor: Lenovo |
![]() |
June 2008 GOVERNMENT 0.0: WORK WITHOUT THE WEB
These and other "realities of working in government agencies" give Schrier "a different view" on at-work Internet use from the one I outlined in a column that appeared in Governing's May issue and last month's newsletter. (Column: At Work on the Web) And since Schrier is among the most insightful municipal technology leaders I know, the concerns he detailed in his blog (Seattle's Chief Geek) gave me pause. I also heard from plenty of aggravated state and local workers who agreed with my conclusion that overly restrictive Internet-use policies in government offices may do just as much harm as they aim to prevent. A senior official from a county in Iowa, for instance, wrote to tell me that he had reached the "boiling point" with his jurisdiction's Internet policy. His frustration started with a link to the local radio station -- a link posted on his county's own Web site. Blocked. Later the official tried downloading maps from a site that showed gas pipelines in his community. Nope -- blocked again. When the official also was prevented from watching an online sample video of a potential conference speaker, he said he actually left the office "to regain his composure." In all three instances this official was trying to download information that was directly relevant to his work for the county. Technology administrators have good reason to use tools such as Websense to monitor employees' online activities, and even to block access to clearly inappropriate content. On the other hand, some policies go too far, imposing Internet restrictions that seem to have as much to do with public-relations worries as they do with real security and productivity concerns. Meanwhile, overly stringent limits on online activity risk hampering creative thinking and best practices for e-government and discouraging the next generation of technology thinkers from considering government careers. Many of the dot-gov'ers who contacted me agreed that clear and enforceable Internet-use policies, regular training, and strong security software are better long-term remedies than cutting off access to information that has potential to improve how government does business. But just as many government tech leaders told me that my thinking was naive and that I was understating the security threats and management challenges they face when it comes to employee Web trolling. One New York official said bluntly that I was just not "seeing the constant barrage of attacks on our network, all of which are coming from the Internet." Writing in his blog, Seattle's Schrier made clear he was in that camp too. Many diligent, well-intentioned, hard-working city employees just "can't help themselves from surfing or bidding on eBay or browsing MySpace for their friends," he wrote. Most of those workers earn enough to "buy a personal computer for home" and have the time "to indulge themselves in the cyberworld" there. "Public employees are held to a higher standard than workers in any other industry," Schrier said. "When there's a disaster, private employers shut down and their employees go home. Public employees work 12-hour shifts for the duration of the emergency. Those same higher standards apply to use of city equipment and conduct at work day-to-day, and the Internet content filters remind all of us of our duty to meet that standard." Websense and other Internet filtering software reduce the need to formally discipline workers for non-business use of city computers and "helps keep honest people honest," Schrier said, comparing some of the online conduct he has seen to problems "with pin-up girls decorating cubicles" in earlier times. "The Pin-up Girls are long gone from the workplace. Let's not bring them back with the web and Internet." Banning pin-ups on office walls makes perfect sense to me -- as do reasonable limits on and policing of Internet use. But as I put it in a comment on Schrier's blog, blocking access to useful and appropriate online content just because there also is inappropriate content out there seems to me like the equivalent of banning the wall, not just the pin-up. Schrier thought that analogy was flawed too. "In the case of pin-up posters, what had to be regulated was not the walls nor the posters, but the behavior of employees who could not regulate themselves," he wrote back. "The same is true of Websense or other Internet monitoring/blocking software. We are not regulating the Internet itself (walls) or content (pin-up posters) but rather the behavior of employees who cannot regulate themselves." If you have your own take on this complicated subject, leave a comment and join our ongoing online conversation. You'll also find that Seattle's Chief Geek has plenty of other smart and useful ideas and observations. Assuming, that is, you can access blogs from your computer. TWITTERING ONE'S THUMBS The Governing staff in Seattle blogged about the conference proceedings on our own Web site as well, posting items about fusion centers, the public-record implications of Web 2.0, and a handful of the numerous other topics we covered in three busy days of discussion. (Blog posts from Managing Technology) I also enjoyed a running commentary on the conference via a Twitter feed from David Fletcher, Utah's chief technology officer. Fletcher was one of two people who raised their hands when I asked a lunch crowd of a few hundred who among them was using Twitter. The governmental potential of services such as Twitter, particularly for emergency management and communication, was a topic we covered in some depth in the closing session of the conference. Twitter feeds posted by communities from Los Angeles to Franklin, Mass., help illustrate the potential too. However, Twitter's architecture is having a tough time keeping up with its popularity, creating annoying and frequent service disruptions. In fact, the problems are serious enough that the company has established a blog (status.twitter.com) just to talk about how it's dealing with performance and reliability concerns. Those issues ultimately may limit Twitter's public-sector application for sharing critical information -- at least in the near term. But the platform is still worth exploring and understanding. Still no idea what I'm talking about? Actually, many conference attendees told us they had no idea what Twitter or microblogging was all about. So we showed a short video -- Twitter in Plain English -- to convey the basics and kick off the conversation. Maybe it will give you ideas too. Is your state or locality using Twitter, formally or informally? Let us know at techletter@governing.com
HELP FOR HELPING HANDS DEALS The Wisconsin Department of Transportation will implement AutoCAD's Civil 3D software to produce new roadway designs, automating much of the roadway design and documentation process with 3-D information models. Implementing an agreement with the Connecticut Department of Transportation, TrafficLand is integrating 153 ConnDOT traffic cameras into its network and feeding the video to the agency's Web site as well as its own site. GovPartner has been selected by Houston to implement the city's one-stop e-government Web portal, CommunityDevelopmentPartner, for issuance of permits and licenses. The Oregon Department of Human Services has selected CGI Group to develop and implement its next-generation statwide automated child-welfare information system. The 36-month contract is valued at $29.6 million. Hawaii and Maine have signed contracts with NIC to continue managing the states' Web portals, Hawaii.gov and Maine.gov. The Hawaii agreement runs through 2013, and the Maine contract runs through 2012. Missouri has selected Symantec's Enterprise Vault as the state's e-mail archiving platform, enabling the state to comply with legal-discovery requirements and information-access policies. Tyler Technologies will provide its MUNIS financial management software and related professional services to Westport, Conn., under a five-year application service provider contract. Seventeen Virginia Community College System campuses have launched Cooper Notification's Roam Secure Alert Network emegency notification system, allowing campus safety officials to send targeted alerts. ADT is deploying a system of 34 surveillance cameras, using a wireless mesh network, to monitor high-crime areas of Richmond, Calif. The cost of the system is about $1.8 million. BearingPoint has implemented a $28 million new human resources and payroll computer system for North Carolina, replacing 30-year-old computer systems. The Los Angeles County Treasurer and Tax Collector Department has awarded Capita Technologies a $12.5 million contract to develop a case-management system to enhance service levels and improve probate and guardianship service. Experian QAS will assist the Alabama Department of Industrial Relations and the Colorado Unemployment Insurance Program on address-verification services. The Florida Department of Agriculture Services has selected GeoAnalytics to implement a geospatial data integration system, which initially will provide spatial data and analysis support for emergency planning and response functions. |