Public Money
| More

Rx: Pay Less and Get Less

Narrow-network HMOs are the new cost-cutting tool.



Name

Girard Miller

Girard Miller is the Public Money columnist for GOVERNING and a senior strategist at the PFM Group.

Related Articles

One rapidly emerging tool for cost-cutting employers is the narrow-network HMO, which can reduce employers' medical insurance premiums by as much as 25 percent. These plans offer participants fewer choices, which enables the network to reduce its premiums for both employers and employees. High-cost doctors and diagnostic facilities are simply removed from the insurance roster and become inaccessible for the average subscriber.

In California, the giant statewide CalPERS health care system and the University of California have both begun offering these options — and participation has reportedly grown rapidly. Employees pay lower premiums, which saves them money with lower paycheck deductions. But they must then work with fewer doctors and cannot access certain physicians outside the network unless they pay much steeper fees for out-of-network services.

The narrow-network benefits plans will likely become one of the tools that public employers use to curb their retiree medical costs, forcing those receiving "unlimited" benefits to stay inside the narrow network. That seems like a reasonable measure, on the theory that most retirees have more time to shop for and drive to in-network providers. By making these narrow networks the standard for active employees, the employer can argue that benefits are equivalent for the retirees. By cutting their active employee benefits costs, employers can reduce their OPEB ("other post-employment benefits") liabilities and thus their required actuarial contributions. That leverages their budgetary savings in many cases.

I predict we'll see a lot more of this in the next year or two, as public employers have fewer and fewer options to curb their costs, and employees seek lower premiums in their payroll withholding. We will also see more public employers insisting that these narrow networks become the standard benefit in their collective bargaining agreements, with employees required to pay up for broader-access networks.


You may use or reference this story with attribution and a link to
http://www.governing.com/columns/public-money/Pay-Less-and-Get-Less.html


If you enjoyed this post, subscribe for updates.

You May Also Like

Comments



Add Your Comment

You are solely responsible for the content of your comments. GOVERNING reserves the right to remove comments that are considered profane, vulgar, obscene, factually inaccurate, off-topic, or considered a personal attack.

Comments must be fewer than 2000 characters.

Latest from Public Money

  • What’s the Point of Rainy Day Funds?
  • States and localities both save for unseen emergencies and hard times. But when it comes to using the funds, their approach couldn't be more different.
  • Gun Debate Revives the Pension-Investment Dispute
  • When there’s public outcry over something -- whether it’s gun control or apartheid -- states and cities reevaluate what their pension plans invest in. But should they be social investing at all?


Upcoming Webinars


  • High-Performance Government - Building "Better, Faster, Cheaper"
  • June 20, 2013
  • Nationally, six straight years of revenue declines have put enormous pressure on state and local governments, nevertheless, some are thriving. Standard & Poor's, the credit-rating agency, reports that it issued more bond upgrades than downgrades in 2012.

  • Health Care Reform is Here: Are You Ready for the Rush?
  • June 27, 2013
  • The Medicaid expansion and the Affordable Care Act are in full swing. With the influx of people who will be applying for benefits and the ACA requirement for online enrollment, it is more important than ever to verify the identities of those accessing benefits up front.



© 2011 e.Republic, Inc. All Rights reserved.    |   Privacy Policy   |   Site Map