Manager's Choice

The Vacuous Job Description:
Readers Respond

Here are readers’ ideas for coping with this month’s Manager’s Choice dilemma. To post your own ideas, see the instructions at the bottom of this page.

FIGHT FOR INTELLIGENT RECRUITING

I know that it sounds like tilting at windmills, but reforming the way we hire people in government has to be our responsibility. You may not win, but you can fight the good fight, and progress has been made in some states and municipalities.

Bob Behn's Manager's ChoiceJob descriptions are dangerous and should be done away with. We fool ourselves that we have all contingencies covered with a zillion-page document. This bears an uncanny resemblence to legislatures trying to micro-manage state agencies by crafting ornate all-encompassing legislation, and is just as ineffective.

If you’ve written a good outline of the job that you feel will attract good candidates, use it. To get the HR bureaucracy to do what needs to be done, use the vacuous description officially, but use your own in your recruiting materials. The type of person that you’re looking for may not be naturally attracted to public service. Cast a wide net, perhaps using media ads or a professional recruiting firm.

Too many times we see the pool of candidates kept small because only those who know the “secret handshake” (i.e., how to work your way through the job application bureaucracy) make the cut and for all the wrong reasons. When asked if state government has a nepotism policy, I reply, “Yes, it’s required.” It seems that frequently the only people who know how to get a government job are friends or relatives of those already in government.

As for the Agency of Human Resources — trade them to East Dakota for a draft choice to be named later. I can’t figure out why we have such entities in the first place. Much of their time is spent obfuscating line managers with obscure rules and procedures that didn’t make sense when they were imposed 100 years ago.

Roger D. Cross
Administrator
Wisconsin Division of Motor Vehicles
Madison


100 PERCENT AGREEMENT

I agree 100 percent with the advice. Specific performance goals have no place in a job description.

Dave Pasley
Special Projects Coordinator
Department of Public Works
City of San Antonio


MOUNTAIN OF COTTON BALLS

As the director of land planning and development in Pima County and someone who has adroitly navigated the bureaucracy for 27 years, I concur with Bob Behn. I have used a generic description, such as “program coordinator,” for just this type of position. As long as the pay range works and the job description is general enough, it will work. I write the ad to be more specific and reflect what we really want, put the word out in the community and gear the questions towards what we want.

No matter how hard you persevere, you can’t change the system. It is like climbing a mountain of cotton balls — use what you have. Besides, when you get the person you want, you should be writing them a letter of expectations, which is a real job description, so there are no misunderstandings. P.S.: Why would he want to go to the governor for such a little problem in the scheme of things. Save that for something really necessary and big.

Judith Patrick
Director, Land Planning and Development
Pima County, Arizona


FRONT-END PLANNING NEEDED

I agree with Bob Behn’s response and the thinking behind it. I would like to add an important “front-end” step completely separate from the position description, which reinforces the need for thorough front-end planning/thinking through what you want to achieve or have come out at the end of a process or effort.

In the case of this brand new position in West Dakota with no history of either failures or accomplishments, it is essential to establish clear expectations for the interviewees and ultimately for the person selected, with this statement of expectations also being used in the process of sorting through resumes and referrals of possible individuals to interview for this new position. Clear job performance expectations — Management 101. To that end, I suggest that the following actions be taken:

1. The secretary of environmental affairs needs to define goals and objectives for the position — short-range, intermediate and long-range goals with hoped-for time-frames attached.

If there are “quick-hit” kinds of things for the person hired to do which can be easily identified, those items become at least part of the short-range goals. When the person hired starts working, the quick hits provide both an immediate focus for addressing the ultimate goals and objectives and for being able to demonstrate short-run progress/success which hopefully begets intermediate and long-term progress and success. These items should be as specific as possible.

The intermediate and long-range goals should build at least in part on the quick hits, but they also should reflect publically stated policy objectives of both the governor and the secretary, particularly any policy objectives stated in the governor’s State of the State message or in the Executive Budget recommendations.

These goals and objectives should be:

  • given to persons who express an interest in interviewing for the position, and

  • used in the interview process to assess the thinking processes of the interviewees in achieving these goals and objectives. The goals and objectives need to be as specific as possible — the broad platitudes such as “Saving the environment for our children and our children’s children” can be included as a backdrop, but not the primary focus.

    2. The secretary should use these goals and objectives for the beginning of a performance appraisal for the person hired into this position. It doesn’t matter if the West Dakota Department of Envrironmental Affairs does or does not have a “formal” performance appraisal process in place. Filling a new position provides an excellent opportunity for the supervisor — in this case the secretary/department director — to mentor the person in the position. Even Cabinet-level political appointees can do this. Or, the secretary can delegate this to the deputy secretary/director. And, even experienced administrators and managers can benefit from well-placed mentoring guidance. The performance appraisal keeps the person hired focused, and it provides an accountability mechanism for the secretary to assist in ensuring that the purpose behind the establishment of the position is achieved or at least advanced.

    In each of the above items, the purpose is to assist both in the interview and selection process and in the important performance monitoring effort. It should result in a better hiring process and, most importantly, in a better shot at achievement of the expected results — it supports a “win-win” for both the persons involved and for state government. This is an example of responsible management in the public sector.

    If Buzz Lightyear, the space commando character from the movie Toy Story, were a government manager, he would shout “TO GOOD GOVERNMENT AND BEYOND!!!”

    James M. Kasprzak
    Director
    Bureau of Administrative Services
    Michigan Family Independence Agency


    FOCUS ON RECRUITING, NOT REVISING THE JOB DESCRIPTION

    I agree with Bob Behn that the priority here is to get the “right people” to apply for this position. Changing the personnel bureaucracy can wait. To attract the right people, the secretary must first understand that a job description, a performance goal, and a job advertisement are different from each other. Each has a role in this case study, but their roles are different. Ideally, all three can coexist, even peacefully, and can be used to hire a talented director of environmental partnerships.

    First, the job description. Ordinarily, this is a boilerplate document used to support an organization’s classification system. It catalogues job duties, often in a mind-numbingly boring and/or “vacuous” fashion. That may frustrate the secretary, but it’s not the end of the world.

    Performance goals, on the other hand, detail the results the person in the position is expected to accomplish (e.g., reduce specific forms of pollution, increase habitat productivity by 5 percent), while performing the duties listed in the description.

    Then there is the job ad (or announcement, brochure, Internet posting, etc). This will be a key to getting the right people to apply. The ad should describe the job in a way that allows potential candidates to decide if they’re qualified and interested (in personnel-speak, this is known as providing a “realistic job preview”).

    My advice to the secretary is to work with personnel to get the job description approved as quickly as possible, using whatever language personnel thinks will work. Then, more importantly, the secretary and personnel can devote their time, resources and energy to conducting an aggressive recruiting campaign (”cast a wide net”).

    A first step in this campaign is to craft a job ad (and/or brochure, etc.) that describes this exciting opportunit, and doesn’t sound like a job description. The implication in the case description is that the job ad has to duplicate the description. I disagree.

    In Wisconsin, when we train managers how to recruit, we tell them that there is no law that a job ad has to look like the job description. In fact, we tell them there should be a law that an ad can’t look like the description.

    How many times do we see a classified ad for a public sector job that is a single paragraph, maybe 14 inches long, with small, dense type? This ad looks like a legal notice and seems to scream to the reader: “This is a government job.” This approach doesn’t attract candidates — it discourages them, and wastes time and money.

    To hire a qualified director, the secretary should work with personnel to craft an attractive and compelling ad, brochure, etc. that outlines job duties (in plain language); includes goals (e.g., reduce specific forms of pollution, increase habitat productivity by 5 percent); details qualifications (innovator, consensus-builder); tells the reader why this is a great opportunity; identifies the salary range; and describes how to apply.

    The case description is full of words that could be used in the recruiting campaign to describe the job and what the governor and secretary expect (e.g., improve air and water quality; collaborate on multimedia enforcement and mitigation strategies; reduce the accumulation of pesticides, toxic substances and other wastes; improve wildlife habitats; create collaborating partnerships; etc.). The secretary has already “pounded out” much of this material — it should be used in the job ad and the recruiting campaign.

    The ad should also attract candidates by publicizing and emphasizing the positive aspects of this exciting opportunity. I’d focus on the challenge of this brand-new position, its uniqueness, the opportunity to improve the environment and therefore the quality of life for West Dakota’s citizens, the chance to create a national model for regional environmental partnerships, etc. This it what will attract applicants.

    After the secretary reviews the résumés of the many qualified people who will undoubtedly apply for this exciting opportunity, he or she will decide whom to interview. Then, personnel can send those applicants copies of the job description, perhaps accompanied by the message that this is simply the technical description of the job. Then the fun — interviewing — begins, and should be conducted as Dr. Behn describes.

    For too long in the public sector, many of us have simply assumed that we’ll always have enough qualified candidates for our jobs. As a result, we didn’t pay enough attention to recruiting and marketing our opportunities. That time is long past, and now we must develop ways to recruit more widely and effectively. In this “Manager’s Dilemma” case, I believe the secretary can successfully recruit a director, by aggressively conducting a broad, multi-media recruiting campaign. He or she can accomplish this while still meeting personnel’s technical requirements.

    Robert J. Lavigna
    Administrator
    Division of Merit Recruitment and Selection
    Wisconsin Department of Employment Relations

    Madison


    TURF MIXING

    You’re mixing turfs. Job descriptions have nothing to do with performance goals. Now, I’m not saying they shouldn’t, I’m just saying they do not from my experience. Job descriptions are the turf of Human Resources or, more exactly, of Personnel Management (PM). The average PM knows Planning, Coordinating, Developing, Monitoring, Filing, Typing, Spinning, Weaving, Attending, Conducting and all those other great task-like terms. They can screen a job application or résumé in seconds with terms like that. Everett’s got it right.

    Now, when your secretary of environmental affairs gives Everett a statement of specific responsibility with attached specific goals, he’s lost. How do you expect him to screen job descriptions with words like that? These terms are in the turf of the Office of Management and Budget (more specifically, in the Performance Budget Book published quarterly). Tell your secretary that he’s about to have a turf battle on his hands. Let Everett do her job and go talk to the source of his financing, who understands accountability. He’s just expecting too much from his HR system. Nothing is as simple as that in government.

    Frederick Stanley
    Senior Management Analyst
    Office of Internal Audit City of Orlando, Florida

    Agree or disagree? If you think you have a better way to deal with this month's Manager's Choice dilemma or would like to expand on the approaches presented here, share your thoughts with other readers. Send your solution to mailbox@governing.com. Please include your name, location, government or business title or job description, and a daytime phone number (for verification purposes).

    Copyright © 2000, Congressional Quarterly, Inc. Reproduction in any form without the written permission of the publisher is prohibited. Governing, City & State and Governing.com are trademarks of Congressional Quarterly, Inc.