Otis White, over on our "Urban Notebook" page, makes a point about units of local government in St. Louis that is worth highlighting: &...
Otis White, over on our "Urban Notebook" page, makes a point about units of local government in St. Louis that is worth highlighting:
"St. Louis has the second-highest ratio of local governments to citizens (31.7 per 100,000 population, second only to Pittsburgh). Your assumption: People must pay a lot for all these governments. Nope. St. Louis is fourth from the bottom for the percentage of total personal income claimed by local government."
That's significant, because one of the arguments you'll always hear made by proponents of regionalism is that merging services or agencies will save money. It can be done where there are duplicative services. But promises of monetary savings are usually overblown.
That doesn't mean there aren't other good reasons to combine governments, such as efficiency or making the lines of decision-making more clear.
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
Obama Adjusts His Legal Strategy in Immigration Case26 minutes ago
O'Malley 2016 Supporters Launch Super PAC Before His Official Announcement16 minutes ago
The Case for Taxing Bottled Water6 minutes ago
Anticipating a Government Shutdown, Alaska Freezes Hiring3 minutes ago
Unfazed by Boycotts, Indiana Won't Even Study LGBT Protections13 minutes ago
Texas Lawmakers Can't Even Agree on Texting-While-Driving33 minutes ago