from Governing's Managing Technology Conference in Seattle Bill Gregoricus, a senior consultant in Tennessee's Office of State Planning and Policy, had an interesting--and somewhat disheartening--explanation ...
from Governing's Managing Technology Conference in Seattle
Bill Gregoricus, a senior consultant in Tennessee's Office of State Planning and Policy, had an interesting--and somewhat disheartening--explanation for why government can be overly risk averse, sometimes eschewing best practices that entail risk in favor of the safe route:
I can deal with the board and shareholders, but I don't want to deal with the press or angry legislators.
It strikes me as sad that government is precisely where concern for the good and for getting it right should trump all other issues, but often doesn't. Many a government problem, it seems, leads to an eruption of headlines and hearings without ever addressing the root causes or underlying institutional challenges that created the problem in the first place.
For boards and shareholders, the primacy of the bottom line means that when something goes wrong, assigning (and shifting) blame, grandstanding, and political point-scoring all take a back seat to fixing the problem.
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
Important Questions Yet to Be Answered in Deadly Hoboken Crash1 hour ago
El Cajon Shooting Reignites Debate Over How Police Deal With the Mentally Ill1 hour ago
UnitedHealth and University of California Forge Unique Alliance1 hour ago
Pennsylvania's Special Protections for Drilling Industry Invalidated in Court1 hour ago
California Promises to Make Voting a Lot More Convenient57 minutes ago
School Choice Funding Method Rejected by Nevada Supreme Court52 minutes ago