Pension Woes Mounting?
My "pension doom ahead" folder is bursting with clips lately. E.J. McMahon, writing in today's WSJ (paid subsc), argues that public pension ...
My "pension doom ahead" folder is bursting with clips lately.
E.J. McMahon, writing in today's WSJ (paid subsc), argues that public pension funds around the country are hiding as much as $1 trillion in future liabilities by using optimistic actuarial assumptions. McMahon believes that the 8 percent rate of return many public funds assume they'll make is too rosy. "If private-sector accounting standards were applied to these systems," he writes, "they would all look much worse."
Meanwhile, yesterday's NY Times noted that NYC's reportedly sound pension fund suddenly goes $49 billion in the hole if you tweak a few actuarial assumptions. (A previous story foretold pension problems around the U.S.).
The undercurrent in all these stories is that there are more cases of San Diego-itis out there. Are they right?
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
What Happened to the Conservation Money the Interior Department Sent to California?4 hours ago
Sheila Dixon Is Running for Baltimore Mayor Again4 hours ago
Jobs Training as Rehab4 hours ago
Wisconsin Tenure Fight Likely to Spread to Other States5 hours ago
Why It's So Hard to Fix California Freeways5 hours ago
Supreme Court Case Could Determine Future of Public-Sector Unions12 hours ago