Pension Woes Mounting?
My "pension doom ahead" folder is bursting with clips lately. E.J. McMahon, writing in today's WSJ (paid subsc), argues that public pension ...
My "pension doom ahead" folder is bursting with clips lately.
E.J. McMahon, writing in today's WSJ (paid subsc), argues that public pension funds around the country are hiding as much as $1 trillion in future liabilities by using optimistic actuarial assumptions. McMahon believes that the 8 percent rate of return many public funds assume they'll make is too rosy. "If private-sector accounting standards were applied to these systems," he writes, "they would all look much worse."
Meanwhile, yesterday's NY Times noted that NYC's reportedly sound pension fund suddenly goes $49 billion in the hole if you tweak a few actuarial assumptions. (A previous story foretold pension problems around the U.S.).
The undercurrent in all these stories is that there are more cases of San Diego-itis out there. Are they right?
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
Debate Rages Around Proposed Tax Incentives Rule6 hours ago
Atlantic City on the Brink of Financial Disaster8 hours ago
N.J. Transportation Fund Talks Collapse9 hours ago
New York's Fracking Ban Leads to Secession Talk9 hours ago
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Against Alabama's Redistricting Plan12 hours ago
Conservative Justices Weigh Cost and Benefit of EPA Emissions Rule12 hours ago