Pension Woes Mounting?
My "pension doom ahead" folder is bursting with clips lately. E.J. McMahon, writing in today's WSJ (paid subsc), argues that public pension ...
My "pension doom ahead" folder is bursting with clips lately.
E.J. McMahon, writing in today's WSJ (paid subsc), argues that public pension funds around the country are hiding as much as $1 trillion in future liabilities by using optimistic actuarial assumptions. McMahon believes that the 8 percent rate of return many public funds assume they'll make is too rosy. "If private-sector accounting standards were applied to these systems," he writes, "they would all look much worse."
Meanwhile, yesterday's NY Times noted that NYC's reportedly sound pension fund suddenly goes $49 billion in the hole if you tweak a few actuarial assumptions. (A previous story foretold pension problems around the U.S.).
The undercurrent in all these stories is that there are more cases of San Diego-itis out there. Are they right?
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
Chicago Mayor Fires Police Chief Amid Protests6 hours ago
Anti-Obamacare South Warms to Medicaid Expansion7 hours ago
Why Colorado's Obamacare Co-Op is Falling, and Connecticut's Isn't9 hours ago
Wisconsin Will Return to Local Governments Excess Money Collected for Stadium9 hours ago
Citing Chaos, New Jersey Won't Prevent Health Plan Sales9 hours ago
Ohio's 'Parent Trigger' Law Doesn't Work10 hours ago