The U.S. House has voted to allow the president to call up the National Guard in times of emergency without so much as a ...
The U.S. House has voted to allow the president to call up the National Guard in times of emergency without so much as a how-do-you-do to the governor. Myriad governors were complaining about this at the National Governors Association meeting 10 days ago.
Now all the governors have signed a letter complaining about the idea, appealing to the greater wisdom of the Senate to head this idea off.
As this Salt Lake Tribune story notes, the president can federalize the Guard already, although the White House has rarely acted without a state's consent.
Governors have been grumpy for the past two or three years about the fact that large numbers of Guardsmen are serving in Iraq and other federal missions, rather than coping with natural disasters at home.
As I noted in Governing some time back, Congress made it clear 20 years ago, after some governors objected to sending Guardsmen to Central America, that the first priority of the National Guard is serving the federal government. Several governors sued, but the Supreme Court said no dice.
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
The Week in Public Finance: A Run on Pensions in Dallas, Connecticut's Warned and a Threat to Muni Bonds1 day ago
N.J. Court Rejects Civil Service Changes for Public Workers1 day ago
Gov. Brown Appoints California's First Latino Attorney General1 day ago
Why Carrier Deal Could Set Troubling Precedent1 day ago
California Governor Heads to Court to Stop State Worker Strike1 day ago
Votes Miscounted? Your State May Not Be Able to Find Out1 day ago