Judging the Ruling
Here are two takes on that ruling by the New Jersey Supreme Court: 1) "NJ Court Stops Short of Gay Marriage OK" 2) "N....
Here are two takes on that ruling by the New Jersey Supreme Court:
1) "NJ Court Stops Short of Gay Marriage OK"
2) "N.J. Court Opens Door to Gay Marriage"
The first one appeared on Forbes.com yesterday as a headline to an Associated Press article written by Geoff Mulvihill. The second one? It also appeared on Forbes.com yesterday as a headline to an Associated Press article written by Geoff Mulvihill. Both are the truth, but, because of that very fact, neither is the whole truth.
As Zach indicates, this decision has major political implications, although those implications would be more clear-cut had the court simply legalized gay marriage. As it stands, if the second interpretation is what sinks in, you can expect conservatives to be angered and energized. If it's the first one, the ruling won't have much of an impact.
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
On Eve of Vermont's Labeling Law, Nobel Laureates Urge Support for GMOs10 hours ago
Abortion Ruling Spurs Planned Parenthood to Target 8 States11 hours ago
Why Christie Ordered All Road Work in New Jersey to Stop11 hours ago
Illinois (Kind Of) Passes First Budget in Almost 2 Years11 hours ago
Calling It a 'Day of Reckoning,' Alaska Governor Slashes Spending11 hours ago
Court Backs Ohio's Cleanup of Voter List11 hours ago