Judging the Ruling
Here are two takes on that ruling by the New Jersey Supreme Court: 1) "NJ Court Stops Short of Gay Marriage OK" 2) "N....
Here are two takes on that ruling by the New Jersey Supreme Court:
1) "NJ Court Stops Short of Gay Marriage OK"
2) "N.J. Court Opens Door to Gay Marriage"
The first one appeared on Forbes.com yesterday as a headline to an Associated Press article written by Geoff Mulvihill. The second one? It also appeared on Forbes.com yesterday as a headline to an Associated Press article written by Geoff Mulvihill. Both are the truth, but, because of that very fact, neither is the whole truth.
As Zach indicates, this decision has major political implications, although those implications would be more clear-cut had the court simply legalized gay marriage. As it stands, if the second interpretation is what sinks in, you can expect conservatives to be angered and energized. If it's the first one, the ruling won't have much of an impact.
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
The Week in Public Finance: A Run on Pensions in Dallas, Connecticut's Warned and a Threat to Muni Bonds2 days ago
N.J. Court Rejects Civil Service Changes for Public Workers2 days ago
Gov. Brown Appoints California's First Latino Attorney General2 days ago
Why Carrier Deal Could Set Troubling Precedent2 days ago
California Governor Heads to Court to Stop State Worker Strike2 days ago
Votes Miscounted? Your State May Not Be Able to Find Out2 days ago