Is States' Rights a Cover?
The Tampa Tribune has an article looking at various issues on which presidential candidate John McCain has, in effect, punted, citing states' rights. These include ...
The Tampa Tribune has an article looking at various issues on which presidential candidate John McCain has, in effect, punted, citing states' rights. These include offshore drilling, abortion, adoption by same-sex couples and the teaching of intelligent design.
The article quotes some talking heads as saying it's a way of evading a question, plus one who says McCain has been pretty consistent in citing federalism concerns.
As someone who has written a fair amount about federalism, I would say that states' rights tend to be less of a priority than the political points that can be scored by going against them on a particular issue. There are so few exceptions among members of Congress in terms of people consistently upholding states' rights that it's unusual, and therefore striking, that McCain express consistent concern about them.
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
D.C.'s Generous Paid Family Leave Law Heads to Congress for Approval1 day ago
Florist Broke Law in Refusing Service to Gay Couple, Rules Washington Supreme Court1 day ago
Women Can Ignore Abortion Waiting Period, Rules Florida Supreme Court1 day ago
Amid 2 Years of No Budget in Illinois, 1 Thing Is Certain: State Workers' Paychecks1 day ago
Bridgegate May Not Be Over Yet. Judge Rules Case Against Gov. Christie Can Proceed.1 day ago
A Former DNC Chair Endorses Indiana Mayor for His Old Job1 day ago