Is States' Rights a Cover?
The Tampa Tribune has an article looking at various issues on which presidential candidate John McCain has, in effect, punted, citing states' rights. These include ...
The Tampa Tribune has an article looking at various issues on which presidential candidate John McCain has, in effect, punted, citing states' rights. These include offshore drilling, abortion, adoption by same-sex couples and the teaching of intelligent design.
The article quotes some talking heads as saying it's a way of evading a question, plus one who says McCain has been pretty consistent in citing federalism concerns.
As someone who has written a fair amount about federalism, I would say that states' rights tend to be less of a priority than the political points that can be scored by going against them on a particular issue. There are so few exceptions among members of Congress in terms of people consistently upholding states' rights that it's unusual, and therefore striking, that McCain express consistent concern about them.
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
5 Charts Showing How Nearly Every Age Group Is Less Employed56 minutes ago
Kim Davis’ Son Also Refusing to Issue Same-Sex Marriage Licenses2 hours ago
Politicians Love 'Universal' Preschool. If Only They Could Decide What It Means.2 hours ago
How Rural Texas Is Trying to Lure Mental Health Providers2 hours ago
Missouri Right-to-Farm Amendment Doesn't Include Pot3 hours ago
Chris Christie Promises Not to Run as Third-Party Candidate3 hours ago