Code Red for ER One
Just read a Washington Post editorial about a casualty in the HHS appropriations bill: ER One. In Congress's efforts to rid the bill of earmarks, ...
Just read a Washington Post editorial about a casualty in the HHS appropriations bill: ER One. In Congress's efforts to rid the bill of earmarks, the $25 million slated to continue development of the country's first "all-risks ready" emergency department has been eliminated.
This fall, Governing's special report on homeland security wrote about this state-of-the-art facility being designed by the Washington Hospital Center. The public-private partnership has a dual purpose: to be capable of handling a massive number of civilian victims in the event of a terrorist attack, natural disaster or epidemic in the national capital area, as well as to serve as a model and resource for trauma centers in other cities.
The D.C area's status as a high-risk target and the project's broad mission, the Post notes, are why funding for ER One "was exempted from the normal pork-barrel form of distribution" in the president's budget and earlier versions of the HHS budget bill.
So what happened? Congress owes the country an explanation or a change of heart--stat!
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
What to Know from New Data on Displaced Workers7 hours ago
Connecticut Health Exchange Director Leaving to Run Federal Website11 hours ago
Feds to Try Tying Work Requirements to Food Stamps11 hours ago
Undocumented Immigrants Need Lawyers to Use U.S. Legal System13 hours ago
Houston's Recycling Center Has a Problem: Its Neighborhood13 hours ago
Texas Finally Buys Long-Planned Conservation Land14 hours ago