Code Red for ER One
Just read a Washington Post editorial about a casualty in the HHS appropriations bill: ER One. In Congress's efforts to rid the bill of earmarks, ...
Just read a Washington Post editorial about a casualty in the HHS appropriations bill: ER One. In Congress's efforts to rid the bill of earmarks, the $25 million slated to continue development of the country's first "all-risks ready" emergency department has been eliminated.
This fall, Governing's special report on homeland security wrote about this state-of-the-art facility being designed by the Washington Hospital Center. The public-private partnership has a dual purpose: to be capable of handling a massive number of civilian victims in the event of a terrorist attack, natural disaster or epidemic in the national capital area, as well as to serve as a model and resource for trauma centers in other cities.
The D.C area's status as a high-risk target and the project's broad mission, the Post notes, are why funding for ER One "was exempted from the normal pork-barrel form of distribution" in the president's budget and earlier versions of the HHS budget bill.
So what happened? Congress owes the country an explanation or a change of heart--stat!
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
Los Angeles Failed to Collect $1.8 Million in Overtime Reimbursements49 minutes ago
American Wages Might Explain Puerto Rico's Economic Troubles1 hour ago
Majority of Americans Say Confederate Flag Isn't a Symbol of Racism1 hour ago
5,000 Evacuated Following Tenn. Train Fire1 hour ago
Gerrymandering Likely to Get Worse in States1 hour ago
Is It Time to Change How Chicago Funds Teacher Pensions?1 hour ago