A Measure of Success in Massachusetts
No one thought it would be cheap. The question was, would it be effective? And now the latest report from Massachusetts on its universal health ...
No one thought it would be cheap. The question was, would it be effective?
And now the latest report from Massachusetts on its universal health care plan is this: two-thirds of the 600,000 or so Bay Staters who were uninsured two years ago now have coverage. Just under half of them bought their insurance through the private sector; the rest are in subsidized plans -- hence the increase in costs.
While the state is locked in a fierce battle to figure out how to pay for its success--it's bigger and sooner than expected--there is some payback. With emergency room visits down, the state reports it spent 41 percent less for uncompensated care in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 than it did in the same period in the prior year. That came to $68 million less in cash the state had to lay out.
Just to put these numbers into some kind of perspective, a recent Web report from Health Affairs found that government programs pay for about three-quarters -- or roughly $43 billion -- of the uncompensated care bill. A chunk of that bill -- $15 billion -- is paid by state and local governments.
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
Why Obamacare Is Failing in Mississippi9 hours ago
Ratings Roundup: 2014 Statewide Elections11 hours ago
New Yorkers to Vote on $2 Billion School Spending Plan12 hours ago
Exit Interview with AGA's Relmond Van Daniker12 hours ago
States Have No Common Rules About Dealing with Official Emails13 hours ago
Latino Voter Turnout Might Matter a Lot for Races in Colorado14 hours ago