Score One for the Law of Intended Consequences
Sometimes -- make that lots of times -- states pass laws or issue regulations that don't quite work out as intended. Here's a ...
Sometimes -- make that lots of times -- states pass laws or issue regulations that don't quite work out as intended.
Here's a notable exception: smoking bans. Turns out, bans on smoking in public places have a significant and positive effect on public health. The proof is in a new study that tracked the incidence of heart attacks, comparing rates in the city of Pueblo, Colorado, which has had a smoking ban in effect since 2003, and those in nearby counties that had no such bans.
The findings show that in the 18 months preceding Pueblo's ban, rates in the city and surrounding counties were identical. Three years after the ban went into effect, hospitalizations for heart attack had decreased 41 percent in Pueblo. No significant change was noted in the counties.
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
Right-to-Work Applies to State Employees, Rules Michigan Court2 hours ago
Ex-Virginia Gov. Gilmore Joins 2016 GOP Field2 hours ago
California and New York Passed Affirmative Consent Laws, But Are Students Really Asking?2 hours ago
Does Chris Christie Have a Chance?11 hours ago
Most Governors Running for President Have Mixed Economic Records11 hours ago
University of Cincinnati Officer Charged With Murder for Killing Unarmed Black Man11 hours ago