Former North Carolina Gov. Jim Hunt makes the case in favor of superdelegates in the Washington Post: In creating superdelegates, the Democratic Party recognized the ...
Former North Carolina Gov. Jim Hunt makes the case in favor of superdelegates in the Washington Post:
In creating superdelegates, the Democratic Party recognized the expertise that its top holders of public office have gained by running for office themselves. They are experts at winning. They know the issues. They are in a unique position to evaluate presidential candidates. They have a well-honed instinct for how candidates will be received in their own states and districts. In short, they can help the Democratic Party pick a winner.
But the superdelegates' value extends beyond the convention. If they play a role in picking the nominee, they will be more likely to campaign actively for the nominee in the general election.
I vividly remember the presidential election of 1972. George McGovern, a great senator and a war hero, had been nominated at a convention that included few top Democratic elected officials or regular party leaders. The Democratic Party that America saw on television that year and the platform it adopted seemed out of step with mainstream Democratic leaders. We felt the backlash in the elections.
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
The State of Public Employment in 20141 hour ago
How Prepared Are States for Infectious Disease Outbreaks?42 minutes ago
California Works Harder to Teach English Language Learners12 minutes ago
Philadelphia Police Union Chief Decries Shooting Protests12 minutes ago
Vermont Drops Plan to Become First State with Single-Payer Health Care4 hours ago
Drought-Stricken States Collaborate to Preserve Lake Mead4 hours ago