The Exit Pollsters v. South Dakota
Sometimes people talk about exit polls being wrong. Usually, though, they're referring to accuracy, not ethics. In South Dakota, the thinking is that exit pollsters ...
Sometimes people talk about exit polls being wrong. Usually, though, they're referring to accuracy, not ethics.
In South Dakota, the thinking is that exit pollsters who come close to polling places are bad for the voting process. South Dakota law forbids exit pollsters from being within 100 feet of voting locations, instead of 25 feet, which is standard in most states.
The television networks fear that they can't poll accurately from that distance. They're suing the state to change the law, as the Associated Press reports:
PIERRE, S.D. (AP) -- The three major networks, CNN, Fox News and The Associated Press filed a lawsuit Monday asking a federal judge to strike down a South Dakota law that prevents exit polling within 100 feet of a voting place.
The law violates the First Amendment because it restricts the news organizations' speech and commentary about the political process and limits their opportunities to gather information about that process, according to the lawsuit.
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Sioux Falls, asks that the case be handled quickly because South Dakota's primary election is June 3, just three weeks away. It seeks a preliminary ruling before the primary to prevent South Dakota officials from barring exit polling within 100 feet of polling places.
(Hat tip: Ballot Access News)
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
Why Obamacare Is Failing in Mississippi9 hours ago
Ratings Roundup: 2014 Statewide Elections11 hours ago
New Yorkers to Vote on $2 Billion School Spending Plan12 hours ago
Exit Interview with AGA's Relmond Van Daniker12 hours ago
States Have No Common Rules About Dealing with Official Emails13 hours ago
Latino Voter Turnout Might Matter a Lot for Races in Colorado14 hours ago