The Exit Pollsters v. South Dakota
Sometimes people talk about exit polls being wrong. Usually, though, they're referring to accuracy, not ethics. In South Dakota, the thinking is that exit pollsters ...
Sometimes people talk about exit polls being wrong. Usually, though, they're referring to accuracy, not ethics.
In South Dakota, the thinking is that exit pollsters who come close to polling places are bad for the voting process. South Dakota law forbids exit pollsters from being within 100 feet of voting locations, instead of 25 feet, which is standard in most states.
The television networks fear that they can't poll accurately from that distance. They're suing the state to change the law, as the Associated Press reports:
PIERRE, S.D. (AP) -- The three major networks, CNN, Fox News and The Associated Press filed a lawsuit Monday asking a federal judge to strike down a South Dakota law that prevents exit polling within 100 feet of a voting place.
The law violates the First Amendment because it restricts the news organizations' speech and commentary about the political process and limits their opportunities to gather information about that process, according to the lawsuit.
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Sioux Falls, asks that the case be handled quickly because South Dakota's primary election is June 3, just three weeks away. It seeks a preliminary ruling before the primary to prevent South Dakota officials from barring exit polling within 100 feet of polling places.
(Hat tip: Ballot Access News)
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
Bright Spots in the Sad State of Statehouse Reporting21 hours ago
The Week in Public Finance: Public Pensions Edition2 days ago
Low Oil Prices Drain Some But Energize Most Local Economies2 days ago
Missouri Auditor Dies in 'Apparent Suicide'2 days ago
Border Surge Hampering Policing in Other Parts of Texas2 days ago
81,000 Ohioans to Lose Medicaid Coverage2 days ago