Josh Goodman is a former staff writer for GOVERNING..E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
You'd have been forgiven for not really caring about the results of Vermont's legislative elections in 2008. Democrats held comfortable margins in both chambers. Vermont only has one congressional district, so the results wouldn't affect congressional redistricting. Plus, I'm told that the presidential election was interesting.
But, consider this: In November, four Democrats won seats in the Vermont House of Representatives by 34 votes or fewer. The gay marriage veto override passed on a largely party-line vote, without a single vote to spare. Every one of those four Democrats voted for the veto override.
Perhaps, some of the four Republicans they defeated would have voted the same way. And, perhaps House Speaker Shap Smith could have scrounged up another vote or two if he needed it.
Still, without those seats, getting a two-thirds vote would have been very difficult. This was, after all, Vermont's first successful veto override in 19 years. It's probably not an exaggeration to say that a key milestone in the debate over one of the most controversial public policy questions of our time never would have occurred had it not been for a few dozen votes in a few obscure legislative elections.
GOVERNING Politics is the place for news and analysis on campaigns and elections. If there's a ballot measure in California, a legislative election in Alabama, a mayoral election in Anchorage or a governor's race in Rhode Island, GOVERNING Politics probably is writing about it. We love everything about state and local politics, from polls and campaign ads to policy debates and demographic trends.