Measuring the National Mood from Mayoral Elections?
The governor's races in Virginia and New Jersey this fall will be used to assess the national political climate. But, as Chris Cillizza of ...
The governor's races in Virginia and New Jersey this fall will be used to assess the national political climate. But, as Chris Cillizza of the Washington Post noted recently, this is pretty silly.
We're going to judge the political environment based on just two states? That's like trying to decipher the image on a jigsaw puzzle with just two pieces. If Chris Christie's lead foot costs him the New Jersey governorship, will that be an endorsement of the Democratic Party or an endorsement of traffic laws?
I don't want to overstate the case. The Virginia and New Jersey elections could be influenced by the national climate. But, with just two major races, it will be nearly impossible to disentangle local and national factors.
So, here's an idea: Rather than just focusing on the two governor's races, why don't we also use this fall's 18 big city mayoral elections (Buffalo is my cutoff point for a big city) as a gauge of the political climate?
There's only one problem. It's a bad idea.
I was curious whether mayoral election results actually tell us anything about what will happen the next year. So, I looked back at how those 18 cities voted in 1993 (before the Republican landslide of 1994) and in 2005 (before the Democratic sweep of 2006).
In 2005, Democrats won the mayor's races in 16 of them. You'd think that those results foreshadowed the party's wins the next year, except that the Democrats won 15 of 18 mayor's races in 1993, right before they were routed. The only difference between the two years was the Republican victory in Raleigh, North Carolina in 1993.
Why would that be? First of all, most big cities are very Democratic -- so Democratic that they won't often elect Republicans, even in very Republican years.
Furthermore, many mayoral races are non-partisan both in structure (there aren't partisan primaries) and, to a large extent, in spirit. As a result, the national political mood has a limited impact on mayoral races.
If you want to prognosticate on 2010, the best thing to do is to not pay too much attention to this year's governor's elections or mayor's elections. Instead, it makes a lot more sense to look at the president's approval rating, the congressional generic ballot test and polling in specific races that will take place next year.
An appendix: You can see a chart with the mayoral results and the party affiliations of the winners below. Note that the politicians are listed with their party affiliation at the time of the election, which is why Michael Bloomberg is listed as a Republican and Norm Coleman is a Democrat.
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
U.S. Supreme Court Shortens Early Voting in Ohio3 hours ago
White House Gives Millions to Colleges That Link Job Training to Industry Needs3 hours ago
Texas Lt. Governor Debate Turns Friends into Enemies3 hours ago
Yes, the Rent Really Is Too Damn High13 hours ago
The Promising, but Complicated, Impact of State-Funded Preschool15 hours ago
Detroit's Bankruptcy Judge Says He Can't Prevent Water Shutoffs15 hours ago