Does It Hurt the Dems?
We're having an internal debate here at Governing about whether Spitzer's downfall will prevent the Democratic Party from ending the Republicans' 40-year lock on the ...
We're having an internal debate here at Governing about whether Spitzer's downfall will prevent the Democratic Party from ending the Republicans' 40-year lock on the state Senate this year. The Dems only need a couple of seats to do so and appeared to have momentum, especially after gaining a seat in a special election last month.
I made the point yesterday on a Washington Post chat that Spitzer will linger as a campaign issue. My colleagues mostly disagree. Memories are short, Spitzer's scandal was personal, Paterson will enjoy a honeymoon period, and if the new governor is at all successful he'll end up more popular than Spitzer was even last week.
Such is their argument. We'll live and learn. I haven't been working the phones on this yet. But I note that the National Republican Congressional Committee has been putting out releases this week calling on New York Democrats to return "Spitzer's sleazy money." One returned the cash and another donated Spitzer's $2,000 to charity.
We invite you to discuss and comment on this article using social media.
States Offer Immigrants the Safety Net That Washington Won't10 hours ago
Sessions Sets Narrow Definition of and Financial Consequences for 'Sanctuary Cities'13 hours ago
U.S. Supreme Court Rules Racial, But Not Partisan, Gerrymandering Unconstitutional13 hours ago
Gerrymandering Ruling Already Being Felt in Texas14 hours ago
Mississippi Lawmaker Calls for Lynching Leaders Who Let Confederate Statues Come Down in New Orleans14 hours ago
Election of California Democrats' Leader Exposes Party's Divide15 hours ago