How Democrats Lost on Gun Control
Gun rights advocates have been on a roll lately. Is that because Democrats gave up the fight a decade ago?
McDonnell signed the bill anyway, one of more than a dozen pro-gun bills Virginia approved this year; the guns-in-bars law is set to take effect next week. It was one victory for gun-rights advocates in what has been a fruitful year for them in state legislatures.
Still, gun-rights advocates are feeling emboldened enough to try new tactics in the legislatures and the courts. Last year,
What's striking about this account is that Democrats are coming off of two blowout electoral victories in 2006 and 2008. If you'd told me in the 1990s that Democrats would have won two elections in a row, I'd have predicted a golden age for gun control backers. Gun control was one of the basic issues that divided Democrats from Republicans back then -- and a major one at that.
As we can see, that didn't happen. In conservative states, gun rights advocates keep finding new frontiers. Gun control legislation has no chance in Congress. Gun control supporters have to be content doing little more than trying to hold their ground, even in blue states.
How did this happen? The basic story is that, on gun control, Democrats stopped trying. After Al Gore's loss in the 2000 presidential election, Democrats decided that their views on gun control were a political liability. A majority of the public favored gun control, but a majority of the members of the public who actually voted on gun control didn't. Except in a few big cities where the issue had particular salience (because of gun violence problems), Democrats who believed in gun control stopped talking about it.
In some sense, that was an understandable move. If a party doesn't win elections, it can't enact any part of its policy agenda. So, candidates and parties give up on part of what they believe in order to win.
Yet only now are the full consequences of this decision clear. By not talking about gun control, Democrats undermined the movement in favor gun control. More often than not, the public cares most about the issues their political leaders say are important. In 2000, perhaps hundreds of thousands of people attended a march in Washington in favor of gun control. Would that ever happen today? Obviously, groups like the NRA have remained as focused and motivated as ever.
If there's a lesson here, it's that public opinion and political activism aren't static. Parties can choose to respond to public opinion, but they also can choose to try to shape public opinion. It would be really fascinating to know what would have happened if Democrats had kept fighting on gun control. Perhaps the party would have lost lots of elections that they won. But, perhaps they would have won some converts to their cause.
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
Undocumented Immigrants Can't Be Denied Bail, Rules Missouri Supreme Court1 day ago
Interstate Health Care, Part of GOP's Replacement Plan, Has Failed to Attract Insurers' Interest1 day ago
Child Care Subsidies Are Dwindling, for and by the States1 day ago
What Oakland Can Learn From Rhode Island's Response to Deadly 2003 Fire1 day ago
30 Road Projects Halted in Montana Due to Budget Shortfall1 day ago
South Carolina Makes History With 4 Women in State Senate1 day ago