Colorado's Slow Count
There's a pretty good chance that the presidential election will come down to Colorado. So, the pace of the vote counting in Denver for Tuesday's ...
There's a pretty good chance that the presidential election will come down to Colorado. So, the pace of the vote counting in Denver for Tuesday's primary suggests that we all should be stocking up on some gourmet coffee. From the Denver Post :
With a turnout of only about 10,000 voters for the primary election Tuesday, Denver political observers might have thought they'd get early results, including the outcome of a hot-button issue touching on immigration.
Instead, the count dragged on until 1 a.m., and anyone watching the Denver Elections Division website had no way of knowing how close election workers were to finishing at any given point.
"I kept waiting for those Internet numbers to come up," said Councilwoman Jeanne Faatz. "I must have hit the refresh button until I wore it out."
That's 1 a.m. Mountain Time, which translates to three in the morning on the East Coast. Michael Scarpello, Denver's elections director, makes a reasonable point in that same article:
"It's a balancing act. We could spend $8 to $10 million on new machines and have quicker results because we wouldn't have to tabulate at the end of the night. But is it worth it to spend $8 to $10 million to get something two to three hours faster? In our judgment it wasn't worth the expense."
Join the Discussion
After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.
On Eve of Vermont's Labeling Law, Nobel Laureates Urge Support for GMOs16 hours ago
Abortion Ruling Spurs Planned Parenthood to Target 8 States17 hours ago
Why Christie Ordered All Road Work in New Jersey to Stop17 hours ago
Illinois (Kind Of) Passes First Budget in Almost 2 Years17 hours ago
Calling It a 'Day of Reckoning,' Alaska Governor Slashes Spending17 hours ago
Court Backs Ohio's Cleanup of Voter List17 hours ago