Is 2013 the Year of New Transportation Funding?

Several states are signaling their willingness to pursue higher fees and taxes to fund roads, rails and bridges.
by | December 19, 2012
 

The 2013 legislative session hasn't even started, but state lawmakers across the country are already touting the need to find new sources of transportation revenue in the upcoming year. The conversation comes at a time when Congress finds itself entrenched in a culture of austerity and when calls from advocates and stakeholders to increase the federal gas tax -- unchanged for nearly 20 years -- have fallen mostly on deaf ears.

"If we hope that Congress will solve the transportation funding questions in our nation, they won't," said Oregon state Sen. Bruce Starr at the National Conference of State Legislatures' (NCSL) meeting in Washington this month. Starr has been one of the leading advocates for a pilot program in his state that analyzes the feasibility of establishing a vehicle-miles traveled fee, or VMT, which is seen as a more financially sustainable alternative to the gas tax.

In recent years, states have embraced legislation that encourages financing mechanisms like public-private partnerships. But they have been a bit slower to pursue higher fees and taxes, which would address underlying revenue shortfalls. Fourteen states haven't raised their gas tax in 20 years, according to NCSL, and only eight state legislatures along with Washington, D.C., have raised gas taxes since 2008. Just five states index their gas tax to inflation, meaning most states' gas taxes are, to some degree, facing the same fundamental challenges as the federal gas tax.

This article appears in our free, monthly Infrastructure e-newsletter. Click to subscribe.

"We've got to sell this to the public, the fact that there is a need," said West Virginia state Sen. Bob Plymale, who last year sponsored legislation -- eventually vetoed by the governor -- that would have raised DMV fees in order to generate about $40 million annually for road funding.

But attitudes may be changing, as state lawmakers of all political stripes seem to be showing that they're willing to tackle the transportation revenue question:

Will any of those measures actually become reality? We'll see. In the meantime, there does seem to be a growing recognition of the country's infrastructure needs, and the new buzzwords in transportation circles describing the lack of sustainable funding methods are "infrastructure fiscal cliff."

But there's no shortage of solutions: State and federal lawmakers know exactly how much funding they need to maintain existing infrastructure and build new projects to meet their growth projections. In fact, there's a whole cottage industry of advocates, stakeholders and policy wonks developing countless white papers and proposals documenting what work must be done, and importantly, how to pay for it. In short, no lawmaker can say with a straight face that it's unclear how to pay for infrastructure. "It's not a technical problem," said Joung Lee, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials' (AASHTO) associate director for finance and business development "It's a political problem. There's no question about it."

Must Reads

Los Angeles Times: Los Angeles County fell just shy of the two-thirds vote it needed to approve a transportation sales tax last month. Now advocates say that bar is too high, and they're trying to change state law.

Jalopnik: See a slideshow of the country's most ridiculous speed limits, including 10.5 mph in Copake, N.Y.

The Next Web: General Motors will be the first automaker to integrate Apple's voice-controlled "Siri" software into its new models.

D.C. Streetsblog: I participated in the Eno Center for Transportation and Bipartisan Policy Center's post-election transportation discussion. Find out what the election means for transportation policy.

Eno Center for Transportation: Is the gas tax the best way to close the transportation funding gap? Maybe not. Eno's Joshua Schank offers an interesting take, arguing that the feds could instead consider dedicating a portion of the general fund to transportation.

AASHTO: A new report explains how transportation agencies can cut costs while promoting environmental sustainability using case studies from state DOT projects.

The New York Times: City officials in New York face a problem you wouldn't expect -- too many parking spaces (in downtown Brooklyn, at least). The challenge is the result of requirements that residential developments build garages, along with the influx of subway lines and bus routes that mean some residents don't really need cars.

Wired: Transit nerds will appreciate these beautiful visualizations of mass-transit patterns in American and international cities.

Join the Discussion

After you comment, click Post. You can enter an anonymous Display Name or connect to a social profile.

More from FedWatch